Comparative Efficiency of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion and Aerated Static Pile Composting in the Stabilization of Municipal Wastewater Sludge

Introduction: Stabilization of municipal wastewater sludge is a critical requirement for mitigating environmental and public health risks. This study provides a comparative evaluation of mesophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) and aerated static pile (ASP) composting for sludge stabilization at Iran’s largest municipal wastewater treatment plant, with a focus on process efficiency, hygienic quality, and end-product usability. Materials and Methods: Laboratory-scale experiments were conducted using batch mesophilic anaerobic digestion (۳۵ °C, ۲۴ days) and aerated static pile composting. The composting process employed sludge conditioned with bulking and amendment agents under controlled aeration, including a ۶-day thermophilic phase within a ۳۰-day operational period. Process performance was assessed based on volatile solids reduction, pathogen inactivation, and biogas production. Results: ASP composting demonstrated superior stabilization and hygienization performance, achieving more than ۵۰% volatile solids reduction and over ۳-log fecal coliform reduction, resulting in compost meeting USEPA Class A standards. In contrast, anaerobic digestion achieved approximately ۴۰% volatile solids reduction and produced ۵۴۰۵ mL of biogas, yielding biosolids classified as USEPA Class B. Conclusion: While mesophilic anaerobic digestion offers the advantage of renewable energy recovery, aerated static pile composting provides a more hygienically robust pathway for producing stabilized, high-quality compost suitable for agricultural applications. The findings highlight that the selection of sludge treatment technology should be context-driven, balancing priorities between energy generation and the production of sanitized, agriculturally valuable biosolids.

کلیدواژه ها:

Wastewater ، Sewage Sludge ، Anaerobic Digestion ، Composting ، Aeration ، Biogas.