Accuracy of splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for angulated implants in an edentulous mandibular model

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 1

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JDMT-14-4_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 دی 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare the accuracy of splinted versus non-splinted open-tray impression techniques for angulated implants in an edentulous mandibular model.Methods: In this in vitro study, three acrylic edentulous mandibular models were used, each containing three implants placed at angulations of ۰°, ۱۵°, and ۲۵°. Five impressions were obtained from each model using either splinted or non-splinted open-tray techniques (n=۵ per technique/angulation, total n=۳۰). The impressions were made using polyvinyl siloxane with either splinted or non-splinted copings. Reference scans obtained from a laboratory scanner served as the gold standard. Three-dimensional (۳D) deviations between test and reference datasets were measured using Geomagic Control X software, and the results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA at the significance level of P<۰.۰۵.Results: The mean ۳D deviations were ۵۷.۹۰ ± ۱۲.۶۵ µm for non-splinted impressions and ۶۱.۸۴ ± ۱۵.۸۴ µm for splinted impressions. The mean deviation was lowest at ۱۵° (۵۶.۳۸ ± ۱۴.۸۳ µm) and highest at ۲۵° (۶۴.۴۴ ± ۱۴.۶۲ µm).No significant difference was observed in the accuracy of different impression techniques (P=۰.۵۳۵). Furthermore, implant angulation did not significantly affect impression accuracy (P=۰.۴۰۱).Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the splinted open-tray technique demonstrated comparable accuracy to the non-splinted technique. Implant angulation up to ۲۵° did not significantly affect the precision of splinted and non-splinted open-tray impressions.

نویسندگان

Mohammadreza Nakhaei

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Hamidreza Rajati Haghi

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Saied Sabzevari

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Mohammad Shirdel

Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Richi MW, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O. Comparison of the accuracy ...
  • Mukhopadhyay P, Khalikar A, Wankhade S, Deogade S, Shende R. ...
  • Baig MR. Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the ...
  • Moreira AH, Rodrigues NF, Pinho AC, Fonseca JC, Vilaça JL. ...
  • Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Gallucci GO, Doukoudakis A, Weber H-P, ...
  • Moazzami SM, Alizadeh S, Sarvari S. Natural Tooth Pontic and ...
  • Rutkunas V, Bilius V, Simonaitis T, Auskalnis L, Jurgilevicius J, ...
  • Neshandar M, Baloch F, Mousavisedighi S, Bitaraf T. Evaluation of ...
  • Negahdari R, Barzegar A, Milani AM, Ahmadi YS, Rahbar M. ...
  • Algabri RS, Altayyar SA, Abo-Alrejal HO, Alsourori AA, Alshaibani DA, ...
  • Ma Y, Al-Radhi RYZ, Jiang L, Yu H. Does Splinting ...
  • Keerthna M, Jain AR. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of implant ...
  • Güth J-F, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. ...
  • Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O, Ozcelik TB, Yagiz A. Digital evaluation ...
  • Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Güth J-F, Happe A, Beuer F. ...
  • Elshenawy EA, Alam-Eldein AM, Abd Elfatah FA. Cast accuracy obtained ...
  • de Avila ÉD, Chagas Amaral ÂL, Pereira Pinelli LA, de ...
  • Pesce P, Nicolini P, Caponio VCA, Zecca PA, Canullo L, ...
  • Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of ...
  • Akca K, Çehreli MC. Accuracy of ۲ impression techniques for ...
  • Choi J-H, Lim Y-J, Kim C-W. Evaluation of the accuracy ...
  • Abduo J, Palamara JE. Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع