Comparison of the Isomerization Units from the Perspective of Process Design and Energy Studies for Producing High Quality Gasoline

Optimizing energy consumption and gasoline quality in isomerization units has become very important, indicating the need to employ suitable process design methods and energy studies. Aspen HYSYS, Aspen Energy Analyzer, and Aspen Pinch software were utilized for simulation. Optimum heat integration opportunities were identified using composite curves and driving force plots. This study showed significant variations in the minimum approach temperature (ΔTmin.) among the units. Unit ۱ showed the lowest ΔTmin. at ۸°C, followed by units ۲ and ۳ at ۹ and ۱۰°C, respectively. Consequently, unit ۱, with ۳۵.۶۵ MW of hot and ۴۱.۲۴ MW of cold utilities consumption at ΔTmin.= ۸°C, demonstrated the highest potential for heat recovery when increasing ΔTmin. from ۸ to ۱۰°C. The first heat recovery scenario aimed to examine the Research Octane Number (RON) of the output stream from the Deisopentanizer (DIP) column, and the amount of isopentane recovery to improve the existing processes. Unit ۲ has an octane number and isopentane recovery of ۸۵ and ۷۵.۲۴%, respectively, which is the lowest amount among the three units. Economic analysis using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer revealed that unit ۱ had the highest fixed (۷.۶×۱۰+۶ USD), operating (۷.۴۸×۱۰+۶ USD/year), and total costs (۱۳.۷۵×۱۰+۶ USD/year). The second scenario showed that ۱۷% and ۲۰% of the total required low pressure steam in Unit ۱ and Unit ۲ can be provided due to steam generation using process energy pockets, respectively. Results showed that the process design and operating conditions directly influence energy and RON.

کلیدواژه ها:

Energy Saving ، Gasoline ، Isomerization ، Isopentane ، Optimization ، Process design