Analysis of the Jurisprudential Foundations of Financial Penalty in the Context of Tazirat (Disciplinary Measures)
سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 64
فایل این مقاله در 26 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_DIWAN-6-1_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 آذر 1404
چکیده مقاله:
Financial fines or penalties are among the most prevalent deterrent measures against crimes and offenses in contemporary times. This issue has long been a subject of controversy among Islamic jurists. Two viewpoints, the permissibility and impermissibility of monetary fines, have been advocated by Islamic scholars. Both sides present their arguments supported by evidence. The question arises: which viewpoint, in the present time, is more effective, the permissibility or impermissibility? This article, considering this question, examines the reasons presented by both factions, the permissibility, and the prohibition, and discusses the factors causing differences in opinions. The conclusion drawn is that the permissibility of monetary fines is preferred based on relying on verses, narrations, the actions of the companions of the Prophet, analogical reasoning (Qiyas), prioritizing public interest, societal well-being, the necessity of preserving order, and it appears to be more effective as a deterrent measure compared to other forms of disciplinary measures in this era.Financial fines or penalties are among the most prevalent deterrent measures against crimes and offenses in contemporary times. This issue has long been a subject of controversy among Islamic jurists. Two viewpoints, the permissibility and impermissibility of monetary fines, have been advocated by Islamic scholars. Both sides present their arguments supported by evidence. The question arises: which viewpoint, in the present time, is more effective, the permissibility or impermissibility? This article, considering this question, examines the reasons presented by both factions, the permissibility, and the prohibition, and discusses the factors causing differences in opinions. The conclusion drawn is that the permissibility of monetary fines is preferred based on relying on verses, narrations, the actions of the companions of the Prophet, analogical reasoning (Qiyas), prioritizing public interest, societal well-being, the necessity of preserving order, and it appears to be more effective as a deterrent measure compared to other forms of disciplinary measures in this era.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Abdulhaq Habibi Salehi
Panjshir Higher Education Institute
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :