Structural Failure After Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction: Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 62

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TABO-13-12_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 آذر 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Objectives: Management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains controversial regarding ideal surgical indications and technique. While loss of reduction following AC reconstruction is common, its relationship to clinical outcomes is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and potential predictors of suboptimal results in patients with structural failure following AC reconstruction. Methods: Patients with structural failure following AC reconstruction from ۲۰۱۳-۲۰۱۹ were identified, defined as ۵۰% loss of coronal AC joint reduction between immediate and final postoperative radiographs. Failures were categorized by degree of displacement and mechanism, which included traumatic reinjury versus spontaneous subsidence of AC reduction. Suboptimal clinical outcomes were defined as undergoing reoperation or postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score less than ۸۰. Bivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for suboptimal clinical results and compare outcomes between operative versus nonoperative management of structural failure.Results: Twenty-nine patients were evaluated with mean follow-up of ۷.۴ years (range ۴.۰-۱۰.۵ years). ۲۱% underwent revision surgery (n = ۶) and ۷۹% were treated nonoperatively (n = ۲۳). Mean postoperative ASES, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores at final follow-up were ۸۲ +/- ۲۰ (range ۳۳-۱۰۰), ۱.۶ +/- ۲.۲ (range ۰-۷), and ۸۲ +/- ۲۰ (range ۲۲-۱۰۰) respectively. ۴۱% of the total cohort (n = ۱۲) had a suboptimal clinical result. On bivariate analysis, structural failure following acute reinjury was associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes (۵۰% vs ۶%, p = ۰.۰۱۱) and a higher likelihood of reoperation (۶۷% vs ۱۳%, p = ۰.۰۱۸).Conclusion: Structural failures of AC reconstruction following an acute injury are more likely to experience suboptimal clinical outcomes and undergo reoperation compared to spontaneous loss of reduction. Larger analyses are warranted to determine if there are additional factors which may affect outcomes and guide management in these clinical scenarios.        Level of evidence: IV

نویسندگان

Benjamin Campbell

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States

Omar Sarhan

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States

Ryan Lopez

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States

Hamd Mahmood

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States

Cassandra Sanko

Maine General Orthopaedics, Augusta, ME, United States

Surena Namdari

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Aliberti GM, Kraeutler MJ, Trojan JD, Mulcahey MK. Horizontal Instability ...
  • Cadenat F. The treatment of dislocations and fractures of the ...
  • Berthold DP, Muench LN, Dyrna F, et al. Current concepts ...
  • Frank RM, Cotter EJ, Leroux TS, Romeo AA. Acromioclavicular Joint ...
  • Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, et al. Current concepts ...
  • Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Nonoperative ...
  • Chang N, Furey A, Kurdin A. Operative Versus Nonoperative Management ...
  • Natera Cisneros LG, Sarasquete Reiriz J. Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint ...
  • Murray IR, Robinson PG, Goudie EB, Duckworth AD, Clark K, ...
  • Cerciello S, Berthold DP, Uyeki C, et al. Anatomic coracoclavicular ...
  • Gstettner C, Tauber M, Hitzl W, Resch H. Rockwood type ...
  • Moatshe G, Kruckeberg BM, Chahla J, et al. Acromioclavicular and ...
  • Mori D, Nishiyama H, Haku S, Funakoshi N, Yamashita F, ...
  • Muench LN, Kia C, Jerliu A, et al. Functional and ...
  • Van Eecke E, Struelens B, Muermans S. Long-term clinical and ...
  • Chen RE, Gates ST, Vaughan A, et al. Complications after ...
  • Karargyris O, Murphy RJ, Arenas A, Bolliger L, Zumstein MA. ...
  • Skjaker SA, Enger M, Pripp AH, Nordsletten L, Bøe B. ...
  • Tulner SAF, Fowler A, Edwards KL, et al. Radiographic appearance ...
  • doi: ۱۰.۱۰۱۶/j.jcot.۲۰۱۹.۰۱.۰۱۲ ...
  • Shin SJ, Kim NK. Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using ...
  • Jones BK, Fuller C, Kweon C. Failed suspension button acromioclavicular ...
  • Duralde XA, McClelland WB. The clinical results of arthroscopic transtendinous ...
  • Namdari S, Donegan RP, Chamberlain AM, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K, ...
  • Park JY, Chung KT, Yoo MJ. A serial comparison of ...
  • Spencer HT, Hsu L, Sodl J, Arianjam A, Yian EH. ...
  • Choi NH, Lim SM, Lee SY, Lim TK. Loss of ...
  • Clavert P, Meyer A, Boyer P, et al. Complication rates ...
  • Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM, Carson EW, Miller MD, ...
  • Lee BK, Jamgochian GC, Syed UAM, et al. Reconstruction of ...
  • Weinstein DM, McCann PD, McIlveen SJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. ...
  • Millett PJ, Horan MP, Warth RJ. Two-Year Outcomes After Primary ...
  • Lasanianos NG, Kanakaris NK, Dimitriou R, Pape HC, Giannoudis PV. ...
  • Sheean AJ, Lubowitz JH, Brand JC, Rossi MJ. Psychological Readiness ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع