A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic and Histologic Assessment in Ulcerative Colitis

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 108

فایل این مقاله در 26 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ISJTREND-2-9_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 آذر 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows significant potential to standardize the assessment of ulcerative colitis (UC), but a comprehensive synthesis of its performance across the care pathway is needed. This systematic review critically appraises AI applications in endoscopic video analysis, digital histopathology, and multimodal approaches for UC. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and other databases from ۲۰۱۹ to ۲۰۲۵ for studies applying AI to human UC care. We focused on diagnostic accuracy, prognosis, and operational deployment. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment (using JBI and PROBAST tools) were performed by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was prespecified due to heterogeneity. From ۱,۸۴۷ identified records, ۳۲ studies were included. Video-level AI models for endoscopic scoring (e.g., Mayo, UCEIS) demonstrated strong agreement with central readers (κ up to ۰.۹۲) and are being evaluated against regulatory standards. Histology-based AI systems accurately classified activity using indices like PHRI and Nancy (sensitivity/specificity ۸۹%/۸۵%) and significantly stratified ۱۲-month flare risk (HR ۴.۶۴). Multimodal fusion of endoscopy and histology outperformed single-modality approaches for assessing histologic remission and treatment response in clinical trials. Diagnostic differentiation of UC from Crohn's disease achieved high accuracy (۹۹.۱% in one study), while complication detection (e.g., CMV colitis) remains emergent. Common limitations included frame-level analysis with patient-level claims, infrequent external validation, and sparse reporting on calibration and fairness. AI demonstrates expert-level proficiency in standardizing UC activity assessment and shows prognostic value, particularly with histology and multimodal data. For successful clinical integration, future work must prioritize robust external validation, standardized outcome reporting, and prospective evaluation of decision-making impact.

نویسندگان

Rezvan Alizade

Faculty of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Science, Bojnourd, Iran.

Samin Safarian

Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Pardis Geramifar

Faculty of Medicine, Islamic Azad University of Medicine, Tehran, Iran.

Ali Parouhan

Liver Transplantation research center, Tehran University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Fatemehsadat Mirhosseini

Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :