The Eleventh Government and the Structure of the International System from the Perspective of Discourse Analysis

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 8

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ISSLP-4-3_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 آبان 1404

چکیده مقاله:

The transformations of past centuries and the dominance of various forms of international order over the global community indicate that the structure of the international system is constantly subject to change and evolution. Each type of international system can create specific opportunities, threats, or behavioral patterns for the foreign policies of states, including the Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore, the structure of the international system is one of the most significant factors influencing foreign policy, and an accurate understanding of the current and future structure of the international system can play a crucial role in policymaking and achieving foreign policy objectives. This article seeks to employ the discourse analysis theory of Laclau and Mouffe to identify the semantic system, existing signifiers, and articulated elements regarding the structure of the international system in the foreign policy discourse of the Eleventh Government (۲۰۱۳–۲۰۱۷). This discourse, named "Moderation," presented a distinct semantic system compared to the previous administrations (the Ninth and Tenth Governments). Identifying the semantic system and analyzing discourses is a practical and important issue in foreign policy because each discourse contains specific principles and rules, reflecting the signifiers and signifieds that determine the country’s national interests, values, and objectives, thereby indicating the overall orientation of foreign policy. The transformations of past centuries and the dominance of various forms of international order over the global community indicate that the structure of the international system is constantly subject to change and evolution. Each type of international system can create specific opportunities, threats, or behavioral patterns for the foreign policies of states, including the Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore, the structure of the international system is one of the most significant factors influencing foreign policy, and an accurate understanding of the current and future structure of the international system can play a crucial role in policymaking and achieving foreign policy objectives. This article seeks to employ the discourse analysis theory of Laclau and Mouffe to identify the semantic system, existing signifiers, and articulated elements regarding the structure of the international system in the foreign policy discourse of the Eleventh Government (۲۰۱۳–۲۰۱۷). This discourse, named "Moderation," presented a distinct semantic system compared to the previous administrations (the Ninth and Tenth Governments). Identifying the semantic system and analyzing discourses is a practical and important issue in foreign policy because each discourse contains specific principles and rules, reflecting the signifiers and signifieds that determine the country’s national interests, values, and objectives, thereby indicating the overall orientation of foreign policy.

کلیدواژه ها:

Discourse analysis ، structure of the international system ، moderation discourse ، foreign policy ، Eleventh Government

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Iran and the Global Transition of Power: Perspectives and Viewpoints [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Ajili, H., & Afsharian, R. (2016). The discourse of moderation ...
  • Aminian, B. (2002). Building a new global order: Explaining U.S. ...
  • Ashtari, M., Pourghasemi Amiri, A., & Abouei, F. (2020). The ...
  • Ataei, J., & Ghasemi, Z. (2016). The impact of the ...
  • Blouki, S., Khoshkhot, M., Keshavarz, B., & Jafari, F. (2018). ...
  • Blouki, S., Khoshkhot, M., & Keshavarz Qasemi Abadi, B. (2023). ...
  • Daheshiri, M. R., & Bahrami, Z. (2020). The international system ...
  • Dehghani Firouzabadi, S. J. (2015a). Foreign policy of the Islamic ...
  • Dehghani Firouzabadi, S. J. (2015b). Principles and foundations of international ...
  • Haji-Yousefi, A. M. (2005). Foreign policy of the Islamic Republic ...
  • Haji-Yousefi, A. M. (2010). Iran's Foreign Policy during Ahmadinejad: From ...
  • Haqiqat, S., Hosseinizadeh, S. M. A., & Manoocheri, A. (2014). ...
  • Hosseini Matin, S. M. (2011). The structure of the unipolar ...
  • Hosseinizadeh, S. M. A. (2004). Discourse theory and political analysis. ...
  • Howarth, D., & Soltani, A. A. (1998). Discourse theory. Quarterly ...
  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? ...
  • Ikenberry, G. J., Mastanduno, M., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2009). ...
  • Jamshidi, M. (2007). Unipolar international systems: Unipolarity, hegemony, empire. Quarterly ...
  • Javdani Moghadam, M. (2014). The application of discourse approach in ...
  • Jørgensen, M., Phillips, L., & Jalili, H. (2018). Theory and ...
  • Karami, J. (2004). The new international system: Hegemony, multipolarity, or ...
  • Karami, J. (2006). Hegemony in international politics: Conceptual framework, historical ...
  • Kasraei, M. S., & Poozesh Shirazi, A. (2009). Laclaue and ...
  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: ...
  • Mahmoudikia, M. (2018). Logic and worldview of the foreign policy ...
  • Mansouri Moghadam, J., & Esmaeili, A. (2011). An analysis of ...
  • Marsh, D., Stoker, G., & Haji-Yousefi, A. M. (1999). Method ...
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). The Rise and Fall of the ...
  • Mohammadi, M. (2010). The future of the international system and ...
  • Naeimi, A. A., Mir-Koushesh, A. H., & Mohammadzadeh, A. (2019). ...
  • Poostinchi, Z., Ghorbani Sheikh Neshin, A., & Sabouri, Z. (2015). ...
  • Qajari, H., & Nazari, J. (2013). The application of discourse ...
  • Rezaei, A. (2010). The Russian model of order in the ...
  • Rezaei, A., & Torabi, Q. (2013). The foreign policy of ...
  • Rouhani, H. (2013a, September 25). Speech at the 68th United ...
  • Rouhani, H. (2013b, September 13). Speech at the Shanghai Cooperation ...
  • Rouhani, H. (2016, September 17). Opening speech at the Non-Aligned ...
  • Shouri, M. (2003). Hegemony and anti-hegemony. Quarterly Journal of Strategy, ...
  • Soleimanpour, H., & Molaei, E. (2013). Emerging powers in the ...
  • Soltani, S. A. (2005). Power, discourse, and language: Mechanisms of ...
  • Strategic Partnership Statement between Iran and China. (2016, January 22). ...
  • Tabatabai, S. M., & Bahrami, Z. (2018). Continuation of the ...
  • Wilkinson, D. (1999). Unipolarity without hegemony. International Studies Review, 1(2). ...
  • Zarif, M. J. (2014a, September 2). Interview on the special ...
  • Zarif, M. J. (2014b). What Iran really wants: Iranian foreign ...
  • Zarif, M. J. (2015, August 17). Speech at the Journalist ...
  • Zarif, M. J. (2016, December 21). Speech at the Tehran ...
  • Zarif, M. J. (2017a, February 30). Interview on the sidelines ...
  • Zarif, M. J. (2017b, April 22). Publication of an article ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع