The Therapeutic Effect of Curcumin on Episiotomy Wound Healing: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 41

نسخه کامل این مقاله ارائه نشده است و در دسترس نمی باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_NMCJ-15-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 آبان 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Pain and infection following episiotomy are common clinical challenges that impair maternal recovery. Curcumin is a plausible therapeutic agent due to its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, but its clinical efficacy for episiotomy healing remains unproven. We aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of topical curcumin on episiotomy wound healing. Methods: Articles indexed in Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Sciences, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest, SID, and Magiran databases were investigated until March ۱۱, ۲۰۲۵, based on MeSH and Emtree keywords. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB ۱ and ROBINS-I tools. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean difference (MD) with ۹۵% CIs. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Results: Our search retrieved ۲۴۸۶ articles. After removing duplicates and ineligible cases, four articles were provided in the systematic review. Based on the meta-analysis of three studies, the use of curcumin did not have a statistically significant effect on the healing process of the perineal wound between the curcumin and the control groups (MD= -۱.۰۲; ۹۵% CI: -۲.۳۹ to ۰.۳۵, P value= ۰.۱۴), with substantial and statistically significant heterogeneity across studies (I² = ۸۳%, p=۰.۰۰۳). The available evidence was of very low quality. Conclusion: Based on a very small number of studies, the available evidence is of very low quality and does not show a statistically significant effect of curcumin on episiotomy wound healing. Due to the limited and low-quality evidence, it is impossible to draw firm conclusions. This review highlights a critical evidence gap, and future high-quality RCTs are urgently needed.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Fatemeh Shabani

Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Maryam Montazeri۲

faculty of Nursing and midwifery, khalkhal branch, Islamic Azad university, khalkhal, Iran

Mojgan mirghafourvand

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Robab Hasanzadeh

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Bon.C., Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Pakniat H, Bahman A, Movahed F, Mohammadi N. Effects of ...
  • Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, ...
  • Sun Y, Xiao D, Fu W, Cai W, Huang X, ...
  • Nikpour M, Delavar MA, Khafri S, Ghanbarpour A, Moghadamnia AA, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع