Comparative Analysis of Natural and Synthetic Materials for Wastewater Treatment: Plant Powders, Activated Carbon, Biochar, Zeolite, and Nanomaterials

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 191

فایل این مقاله در 25 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCHM-7-4_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 شهریور 1404

چکیده مقاله:

The world faces numerous problems related to water scarcity and pollution, largely due to inefficient wastewater treatment and inadequate methods. A comparative account of five widely known adsorbents-plant powders, activated carbon, biochar, zeolite, and nanomaterials-includes a comparative analysis of their adsorption capacities, cost-effectiveness, and environmental sustainability. On one side, plant powders, being cheap and eco-friendly, on the other side, show lesser performance or lower adsorption capacity, particularly with heavy metals. Activated carbon shows a good degree of adsorption, but its production is costlier and energy-intensive. Due to its moderate performance, biochar also allows carbon sequestration. Zeolites are highly low in their lowness during the ion exchange process and removal of metals, and nanomaterials are good in both adsorption and catalytic activity, though costs and environmental risks delay their applications. This review also emphasizes the case for hybrid systems combining the strengths of different materials and their application in efficient and friendly wastewater treatment.

نویسندگان

Jana Rammal

Research Platform for Environmental Science (EDST-PRASE), Doctoral School, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon

Anis Daou

Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

Dalia El Badan

Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Zaher Abdel Baki

College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila, Kuwait

Salem Darwich

Economic Agricultural Department, Faculty of Agronomy, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon

Wassim Rammal

Research Platform for Environmental Science (EDST-PRASE), Doctoral School, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon

Akram Hijazi

Department of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Kut University College, Wasit, Iraq

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • . a) O.P. Egwuatu, , M.O. Ori, H.S. Samuel, F.M. ...
  • . H. Laksaci, B. Belhamdi, O. Khelifi, A. Khelifi, M. ...
  • . N.A.M. Castillo, L.A.G. Fernández, B. Thiodjio-Sendja, M.M. Aguilera-Flores, R. ...
  • . M.A. Al Masud, W.S. Shin, A. Sarker, A. Septian, ...
  • . A. Shah, J. Zakharova, M. Batool, M.P. Coley, A. ...
  • . S.K. Thengane, K. Kung, J. Hunt, H.R. Gilani, C.J. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع