Phenomenology of the Ethical Dimensions of Electronic Educational Evaluation

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 95

فایل این مقاله در 13 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJETH-7-2_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 مرداد 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Introduction: With the paradigm shift in education, assessment methods will inevitably change as well. To conduct ethically grounded assessments, addressing ethical considerations is essential. Recognizing the importance of this issue, the present study was conducted with the aim of exploring the lived experiences of ethics in electronic educational evaluation. Material and Methods: This study employed a qualitative approach of the phenomenological type. The research population included all faculty members of the Department of Educational Sciences at Bu-Ali Sina University who had teaching experience, as well as all master’s students of Educational Sciences (۲۰۱۹ and ۲۰۲۰) who had experience with virtual learning. Purposeful sampling was used, with the criterion of having completed two semesters virtually and being accessible. The data collection tool was in-depth semi-structured interviews. All accessible faculty members of the department were interviewed, and student interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved, which occurred after ۱۰ interviews. The data collected were coded and categorized using MAXQDA software. Results: Analysis of the findings resulted in ۲۸ sub-categories and ۶ main categories. Conclusion: To conduct ethically grounded assessments, instructors need to understand the essence of electronic education in order to develop a better perspective on electronic assessment. Instructors with pedagogical competence utilize a variety of tools for electronic assessment. According to faculty perspectives, a constructivist approach to electronic assessment emphasizes attention to the process. From the students’ perspective, a learner-centered approach in assessment serves as a means for self-awareness, skill development, and critical thinking enhancement. From both faculty and student perspectives, a process-oriented approach and designing questions at higher cognitive levels reduce the challenges of assessment

نویسندگان

Faramarz Muhammadi Pouya

Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Azimeh Sadat Khakbaz

M.A Student, History and Philosophy of Education, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Azam Rezaei Keramat

Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Kian M. Challenges of virtual education: the narration of what ...
  • Azmi F. Kankarej M. The role of formative assessment in ...
  • Maleki H. Basics of secondary education curriculum planning. Tehran: Samt; ...
  • Ismaili Shad B. Analyzing the lived experiences of teachers during ...
  • Ghasemzadeh A, Mohammadi M, Minaei H. Ethical challenges of school ...
  • Shakeri M, Pakzaban F, Tavalaei M. Designing a professional ethics ...
  • Amin Khandaghi M, Bahman Abadi S. Evaluation ethics: a conceptual ...
  • Tausli T, Saidinia M. A qualitative study of the pathology ...
  • Saraji F. Presenting the ideal model of virtual university curriculum ...
  • Najari Behjat, Mousavi F. A phenomenological study of the challenges ...
  • Abbasi Kasani H, Shams Mourkani G, Seraji F, Rezaeizadeh M. ...
  • Farajollahi M, Haghighi FS. Online education assessment: possible and novel ...
  • Rautela S, Panacka N, Sharma A. Modeling and analysis of ...
  • Karimzadeh E, Rostaminejad M A, Akbari Borang M, Pourshafei H. ...
  • Saraji F, Maroufi Y, Razaghi T. Identifying the challenges of ...
  • Rezaei Karamat A, Mohammadi Pouya F, Khakbaz A. A study ...
  • Karimi V, Amini Mostafaabadi N. Methods of evaluating learners in ...
  • Karamati A, Rahimi M, Afra R. Identifying the challenges and ...
  • Joan Casas-Roma J, Conesa J, Caballé S. Exploring ethical considerations ...
  • Jafari I, Homayouni Bakshayesh N, Alam El Hoda J. Lived ...
  • Bajpai N. Ethical issues of online teaching – learning. International ...
  • Kaya S. Toprak E, Özkanal B, Kaya S. ve Aydın ...
  • Rezaei Karamat A. A study of the lived experience of ...
  • Toprak E, Ozkanal B, Kaya S, Aydin S. Ethics in ...
  • Karimpour A, Mirza Waziri M. The effect of assessment with ...
  • Hedayati Khoshmehr A, Qasimzadeh Alishahi A, Maleki S. The level ...
  • Busikova A, Melicherikova Z. Ethics in e-learning. International Conference e- ...
  • Muhammadipouya F. The bottlenecks of virtual education in relation to ...
  • Muhammadipouya F. The study of teachers' lived experience of the ...
  • Almseidein T A, Kalaif OM. Awareness of Ethical issues when ...
  • Iyadat W, Iyadat Y, Ashour R, Khasawneh S. University student ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع