Design and Validation of an Innovative University Model in Iraq Universities

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 32

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JIMOB-5-3_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 مرداد 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Objective: The present study was conducted to design and validate an innovative university model in Iraq universities.Methodology: This research adopts an exploratory sequential mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative). The study population in the qualitative phase included key experts, faculty members, and university administrators, while in the quantitative phase, it comprised all faculty members and administrators of Iraq universities. The qualitative sample included ۱۰ participants selected through purposive sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved, while in the quantitative phase, ۳۸۵ participants were randomly selected. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis with coding, resulting in a model designed with ۵ dimensions and ۷۹ items.Findings: For model validation, a questionnaire was initially designed, and after assessing face and content validity, ۱۰ questions were removed, leaving ۶۹ questions. The results indicated that all questions had a factor loading above ۰.۴, convergent validity above ۰.۵, reliability for both criteria (Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability) for all dimensions above ۰.۸, and acceptable discriminant validity. Ultimately, the model fit index exceeded ۰.۳۶, suggesting strong validity, reliability, and model fit.Conclusion: Policymakers and planners can utilize the findings of this research as a guide to strengthen and develop universities, transforming them into innovative universities. Objective: The present study was conducted to design and validate an innovative university model in Iraq universities. Methodology: This research adopts an exploratory sequential mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative). The study population in the qualitative phase included key experts, faculty members, and university administrators, while in the quantitative phase, it comprised all faculty members and administrators of Iraq universities. The qualitative sample included ۱۰ participants selected through purposive sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved, while in the quantitative phase, ۳۸۵ participants were randomly selected. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis with coding, resulting in a model designed with ۵ dimensions and ۷۹ items. Findings: For model validation, a questionnaire was initially designed, and after assessing face and content validity, ۱۰ questions were removed, leaving ۶۹ questions. The results indicated that all questions had a factor loading above ۰.۴, convergent validity above ۰.۵, reliability for both criteria (Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability) for all dimensions above ۰.۸, and acceptable discriminant validity. Ultimately, the model fit index exceeded ۰.۳۶, suggesting strong validity, reliability, and model fit. Conclusion: Policymakers and planners can utilize the findings of this research as a guide to strengthen and develop universities, transforming them into innovative universities.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Abdoli, L., Moradi, H., Pardakhtchi, M. H., & Ahmadi, G. ...
  • Abdulkarem, H. A., & Hasan, A. M. (2024). Investing in ...
  • Ahmadzadeh, S., & Shokouh, Z. (2020). The Role of Social ...
  • Alipour, A. (2022). The Value-Innovative University: Moving Towards the Generation ...
  • Alwali, J. (2024). Innovative work behavior and psychological empowerment: the ...
  • Barzegar, Q. a., Nadergholi, & Taqipour, Z. (2020). Presenting a ...
  • Berestova, T. (2009). From innovative projects to an innovative university. ...
  • Budur, T., Demirer, H., & Rashid, C. A. (2024). The ...
  • Gholipour, A., Roya, Ghorbani, & Hafezian. (2024). Designing an Innovative ...
  • Goyal, A., & Akhilesh, K. B. (2007). Interplay among innovativeness, ...
  • Jafarzadeh Ghadimi, R., Enayati, T., & Salehi, M. (2018). Identifying ...
  • Javanmardi, S., & Abbaspour, A. (2022). Identifying Factors Related to ...
  • Javanmardi, S., Abbaspour, A., Khorsandi, T., & Ghayasi, N. (2017). ...
  • Javanmardi, S., Mousavi, T., & Iranpour Mobarakeh, R. (2018). Innovation ...
  • Kazemi, A., & Shakiba, A. (2014). Examining Factors Influencing Innovation, ...
  • Khrifech, L., & Al-Ani, A. K. (2024). The Possibility of ...
  • Mahdi, R., & Keikha, A. (2023). The Status of Innovation ...
  • Mahdi, R., & Shafiee, M. (2018). The Role and Capacity ...
  • Mahdi, R., & Shafiee, M. (2020). A Model and Guideline ...
  • Mahdi, R., & Shafiee, M. (2023). Amirkabir University of Technology ...
  • Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The role of universities in social innovation ...
  • Pourebrahimi, M., Hosseini, M. A., Ebrahimi Barmi, B., Eghbali, M., ...
  • Swanger, D. (2016). Innovation in Higher Education: Can Colleges Really ...
  • Thomas, E., Pugh, R., Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. L. ...
  • Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2016). Conceptualizing innovation in ...
  • Turki, A. (2024). The impact of work pressures on job ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع