Ranking the Indicators of the Model for Enhancing the Quality of Virtual University Education with a Knowledge Management Approach

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 21

فایل این مقاله در 15 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JIMOB-5-3_014

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 مرداد 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Objective: The present study aims to rank the indicators of a model for enhancing the quality of virtual university education with a knowledge management approach, conducted at the Electronic Branch of the Islamic Azad University.Methodology: This study employs a mixed-methods approach with an exploratory objective. The statistical population comprises professors and faculty members of the Electronic Branch of the Islamic Azad University, with ۲۰ individuals purposefully selected for interviews. Data collection tools include semi-structured interviews for qualitative data and a researcher-made questionnaire for quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed using Glaser's (۱۹۹۲) coding method, while the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method was applied in the quantitative phase to assess the significance and performance of the indicators. Additionally, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was utilized to stratify the dimensions of the model.Findings: The study identified ۶۸ quality enhancement components for virtual university education. The indicator "educational system capabilities" (code ۴) ranked first with a weight of ۰.۰۲۹۴, positioned in the first quadrant of the Importance-Performance Matrix, where importance is high, but performance is low. For knowledge management indicators, "knowledge retention and prevention of misuse" (code ۱۷) ranked first with a weight of ۰.۰۵۴۵. Using ISM, dimensions were stratified, with "university management and leadership" placed at the highest level (Level ۱۰) and "services and responsiveness" at the lowest level (Level ۱).Conclusion: The findings highlight that knowledge management dimensions significantly impact the quality enhancement of virtual university education. The hierarchical structure underscores the importance of "university management and leadership" as a foundational element, cascading down to "services and responsiveness" as an outcome influenced by other dimensions. Objective: The present study aims to rank the indicators of a model for enhancing the quality of virtual university education with a knowledge management approach, conducted at the Electronic Branch of the Islamic Azad University. Methodology: This study employs a mixed-methods approach with an exploratory objective. The statistical population comprises professors and faculty members of the Electronic Branch of the Islamic Azad University, with ۲۰ individuals purposefully selected for interviews. Data collection tools include semi-structured interviews for qualitative data and a researcher-made questionnaire for quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed using Glaser's (۱۹۹۲) coding method, while the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method was applied in the quantitative phase to assess the significance and performance of the indicators. Additionally, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was utilized to stratify the dimensions of the model. Findings: The study identified ۶۸ quality enhancement components for virtual university education. The indicator "educational system capabilities" (code ۴) ranked first with a weight of ۰.۰۲۹۴, positioned in the first quadrant of the Importance-Performance Matrix, where importance is high, but performance is low. For knowledge management indicators, "knowledge retention and prevention of misuse" (code ۱۷) ranked first with a weight of ۰.۰۵۴۵. Using ISM, dimensions were stratified, with "university management and leadership" placed at the highest level (Level ۱۰) and "services and responsiveness" at the lowest level (Level ۱). Conclusion: The findings highlight that knowledge management dimensions significantly impact the quality enhancement of virtual university education. The hierarchical structure underscores the importance of "university management and leadership" as a foundational element, cascading down to "services and responsiveness" as an outcome influenced by other dimensions.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmadian, Z., Azizi, M., & Amjadi Hoor, J. (2020). Modeling ...
  • Delghandi, M., karimi, M., Nodehi, H., & Cherabin, M. (2024). ...
  • Ebrahimi, M., Alishah, F., & Zamani Pour, F. (2021). Identifying ...
  • Fischer, C., & Pöhler, A. (2018). Supporting the Change to ...
  • Gloet, M., & Samson, D. (2020). Knowledge Management and Systematic ...
  • Gutiérrez, R. A. C. (2024). Staff Affection, the Key Factor ...
  • Homburg, V. (2018). ICT, E-Government and E-Governance: Bits & Bytes ...
  • Hoseinbar, K. a.-N., Hasanimoghadam, A., Vazifeh, Z., & Shokouhi, J. ...
  • Hsing, C., & Liu, S. (2018). Examining Social Capital, Organizational ...
  • Kaminska, R., & Borzillo, S. (2018). Challenges to the Learning ...
  • Kazerooni Shamiri, H., & Moradi, S. (2019). The Role of ...
  • Moisil, I. (2020). A Model of the Student Behaviour in ...
  • Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, ...
  • Rizun, M. (2016). Intellectual Capital as a Key Factor of ...
  • Schlacht, I. L., Del, M. A., & Nazir, S. (2017). ...
  • Sepahvand, R., Shariatnejad, A., & Arefnejad, M. (2015). The Impact ...
  • Shariati, F., Niazazari, K., & Jabbary, N. (2024). Presenting a ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع