AI algorithms for predicting orthodontic treatment outcomes based on craniofacial morphology

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 141

متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

AIMS02_640

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 تیر 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background and Aims: Orthodontic treatment planning relies on cephalometric analysis (X-ray measurements) to assess jaw and tooth positions. This process is time-consuming and subject to clinician variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential for automation and standardization. This study aims to develop neural networks to predict three clinical decisions: (۱) necessity of tooth extraction, (۲) specific teeth for extraction, and (۳) orthodontic appliance selection, based on craniofacial morphology. Methods: Retrospective analysis of ۳۰۲ anonymized orthodontic patient records (۲۰۱۸–۲۰۲۳) was conducted. Data included lateral cephalograms, intraoral photographs, and ۳D dental models. Twenty-four validated cephalometric parameters (e.g., ANB angle, overjet, crowding index) were extracted. Three neural networks (multilayer perceptrons) were trained: Binary classification (extraction yes/no), Multi-class classification (teeth extraction pattern), Appliance selection (fixed vs. removable). Data were partitioned into training (۷۰%), validation (۱۵%), and test sets (۱۵%). Missing data (۵%) were imputed via k-nearest neighbors. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, AUC-ROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Extraction necessity: Accuracy = ۸۹.۳% (AUC = ۰.۹۵, sensitivity = ۸۸.۱%, specificity = ۹۰.۴%) Teeth selection: Accuracy = ۷۹.۸% (Top-۳ accuracy = ۹۲.۱%) Appliance setup: Accuracy = ۸۷.۶% Key predictive features included anterior crowding index (ACI), ANB angle discrepancy, and incisor inclination. AI reduced planning time by ۶۸% compared to manual analysis. Conclusion: AI models demonstrated clinically relevant accuracy in orthodontic decision-making, with potential to reduce subjectivity and improve efficiency. Limitations include dataset size and single-center data. Future work will focus on multicenter validation, integration with ۳D imaging, and ethical AI auditing. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Orthodontics, Teeth Alignment, Neural

نویسندگان

Amirparsa Partovifar

Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abolfazl Azimi

Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran