Artificial Intelligence in Caries Detection: A Literature Review of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Applicability

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 86

متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

AIMS02_617

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 تیر 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Dental caries remains one of the most prevalent chronic diseases worldwide, with significant public health implications. Accurate and early diagnosis is essential for preventing progression and minimizing the need for invasive treatments. However, traditional diagnostic methods, such as visual-tactile examination and radiographic interpretation, are subjective and prone to variability. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning techniques like convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown promising results in automating caries detection from dental radiographs. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they employed AI or deep learning methods—particularly CNNs—for caries detection using radiographic images. Selected articles were reviewed for model architecture, dataset characteristics, diagnostic performance, and clinical relevance. Results: CNN-based models such as ResNet, VGG, and DenseNet were widely used in the reviewed studies. Training datasets ranged from a few hundred to over ۱۵,۰۰۰ labeled radiographs, annotated by expert clinicians using standardized diagnostic criteria. AI models demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities ranging from ۸۲% to ۹۵% and AUC values between ۰.۸۵ and ۰.۹۷. Several studies reported that AI systems outperformed general practitioners, particularly in detecting early-stage or proximal caries. Discussion: The integration of AI in caries detection offers notable advantages, including improved diagnostic accuracy, reduced inter-observer variability, and faster analysis of radiographic images. However, certain limitations remain. Challenges include limited dataset diversity, difficulties in generalizing across populations, and lack of transparency in decision-making (black-box models). Ethical considerations, such as liability in AI-assisted misdiagnoses and data privacy, also require attention. Despite these concerns, commercial applications like Pearl AI and Diagnocat have demonstrated successful clinical integration and are currently used in dental practices. Conclusion: AI-powered caries detection systems, especially those utilizing CNNs, have demonstrated strong potential as diagnostic aids in dentistry. These systems offer high accuracy, consistency, and efficiency, particularly in interpreting radiographs. While promising, their widespread adoption depends on continued validation in clinical settings, transparent algorithms, and appropriate regulatory oversight. With these considerations addressed, AI can significantly enhance the quality and reliability of caries diagnosis in modern dental care.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Abolfazl Azimi

Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.