Is Care Compatible with The Tyranny of Immediacy? on substituting rhythm for cadence

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 37

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PHILO-19-51_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 تیر 1404

چکیده مقاله:

The article specifies the human being based on the respiratory cycle, referring to the etymology of the word “spirit”. This word shares its root with the French word respiration (“breathing”) as well as the verb “to inspire,” suggesting breath and animation. Human temporality is made up of organic rhythmicity, from a weighing body that experiences itself as inscribed in time – this is the authentic meaning of the word “to exist”: to come from nowhere, without time, to somewhere, at some time. This article questions the compatibility between the demand for temporal efficiency, characteristic of the modern industrial age and the technophile ideology of communication, and the “service society” which purports to be more “caring” than the industrial one. Highlighting the suppression of the passage of time characteristic of the ideology of communication, where “time” is frozen in a self-reproducing present with no past or future, the author asserts that humane care is radically incompatible with a society that subsumes humanity, inscribed in time and in need of breath, under the ideology of a perpetual present. It is precisely on the basis of what specifies the human, namely breathing and desire, that the author proposes to consider how care might be possible in an ultra-technologized world. Drawing on an imaginary of movement and inspiration/aspiration/breathing deployed in choreographic performances and practices, the author invites the reader, as Simone Weil did, to substitute rhythm for cadence, to insert slowness into speed, and to favor the flow of time in a human reality that has become unbearable by dint of “modernization”. In so doing, we must reconsider head-on the fate that binds us, namely death, which no stasis in a perpetual present can eliminate, and which the metaphor of a risk of social necrosis invites us to reconsider. Accepting the passage of time, giving death back its face, is costly; but it's at this price that time can regain its humanizing value, as a sine qua non component of care.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Christine Leroy

University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, Institut ACTE and Lille University, laboratoire STL.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Arendt, A. (۱۹۵۸). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press ...
  • Benjamin, W. (۱۹۶۸) [۱۹۳۵]. The Work of Art in the ...
  • Bergson, H. (۱۹۱۰) [۱۸۸۹]. Time and Free Will: An Essay ...
  • Foster, S. (۲۰۱۰). Choreographing empathy: Kinesthesia in performance. Routledge ...
  • Hamington, M. (۲۰۰۴). Embodied Care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Feminist ...
  • Hamington, M. (۲۰۱۵). Performing care ethics: Empathy, acting, and embodied ...
  • Hamington, M. (۲۰۲۴). Revolutionary Care: Commitment and Ethos. Taylor & Francis ...
  • Lanzoni, S. (۲۰۱۸). A History of Empathy. Yale University Press ...
  • Leroy, C. (۲۰۲۳). Éthique de l’intelligence artificielle et transhumanisme : l’immortalité fait-elle ...
  • Leroy, C. (۲۰۲۴). Performance and Bodily Anchoring of Care: Dance’s ...
  • Munawar, S. (۲۰۱۹). In Hajar’s footsteps: a de-colonial and islamic ...
  • Petersen, A. (۲۰۱۸). Capitalising on ageing anxieties: Promissory discourse and ...
  • Toebes T &, Jonathan de Jong, “Human Forever” (movie). https://teuntoebes.com/documentaireWeil, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع