Evaluation of Seismic Response of Multi-Story Structures: A Comparative Study of Buckling Restrained Braces and Viscous Dampers

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 13

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCER-7-2_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 تیر 1404

چکیده مقاله:

In buckling restrained bracing systems, earthquake-induced elongation problems are solved, and BRB-equipped structures have a much more effective performance in energy absorption in addition to high lateral stiffness. Systems equipped with viscous dampers (VD) also have great potential to absorb seismic energy. To assess the vulnerability of structures equipped with buckling restrained bracing (BRB) and VD systems, three structures (۶-, ۱۰- and ۱۵-story) were chosen as representatives of mid-rise, high-rise and super high-rise buildings and modeled in four states of moment-resisting frame (MRF): the frame equipped with VD, the frame equipped with BRB, and the frame equipped with BRB and viscous damper simultaneously (BRB+VD) using OpenSees-۲.۴.۶ software under incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Seven seismic records were applied, and the maximum inter-story drift response and fragility curves were determined. The results indicated that although the simultaneous application of BRB+VD causes a significant decline in the response of all structures, each of these two systems is able to provide structural safety at various levels in mid-rise structures. It is required to apply both systems simultaneously to provide safety for slight and moderate levels of damage in high-rise buildings, while super high-rise buildings are vulnerable to whole levels of damage, and their structural safety involves the simultaneous use of both systems.In buckling restrained bracing systems, earthquake-induced elongation problems are solved, and BRB-equipped structures have a much more effective performance in energy absorption in addition to high lateral stiffness. Systems equipped with viscous dampers (VD) also have great potential to absorb seismic energy. To assess the vulnerability of structures equipped with buckling restrained bracing (BRB) and VD systems, three structures (۶-, ۱۰- and ۱۵-story) were chosen as representatives of mid-rise, high-rise and super high-rise buildings and modeled in four states of moment-resisting frame (MRF): the frame equipped with VD, the frame equipped with BRB, and the frame equipped with BRB and viscous damper simultaneously (BRB+VD) using OpenSees-۲.۴.۶ software under incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Seven seismic records were applied, and the maximum inter-story drift response and fragility curves were determined. The results indicated that although the simultaneous application of BRB+VD causes a significant decline in the response of all structures, each of these two systems is able to provide structural safety at various levels in mid-rise structures. It is required to apply both systems simultaneously to provide safety for slight and moderate levels of damage in high-rise buildings, while super high-rise buildings are vulnerable to whole levels of damage, and their structural safety involves the simultaneous use of both systems.

نویسندگان

Mansour Bagheri

Associate Professor, Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran

Seyed Abbas Hosseini

Associate Professor, Faculty of Technology and Mining, Yasouj University,Yasouj, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Hatzigeorgiou, D. G., and Pnevmatikos, G. N. “Maximum Damping Forces ...
  • Silwal, B., Ozbulut, E. O., and Michael, J. R. “Seismic ...
  • Hsu, H. L., and Halim, H. “Improving Seismic Performance of ...
  • Banazadeh, M., and Ghanbari, A. “Seismic Performance Assessment of Steel ...
  • Kazemi, F., Mohebi, B., and Yakhchalian, M. “Enhancing the Seismic ...
  • Abdi, H., Hejazi, F., Jaafar, M. S., and Karim, I. ...
  • Guo, W., Wu, J., Hu, Y., Li, Y., and Yang, ...
  • Ataei, H., and Anaraki, K. K. “A Proposed Structural Design ...
  • Rofooei, F. R., and Mohammadzadeh, S. “Improving the Seismic Torsional ...
  • Kang, J. D., and Tagawa, H. “Comparison between Experimental and ...
  • He, X., and Lu, Z. “Seismic Fragility Assessment of a ...
  • Kariniotakis, K., and Karavasilis, T. L. “Limits for the Interstory ...
  • Yahyazadeh, A., and Yakhchalian, M. “Probabilistic Residual Drift Assessment of ...
  • Nomura, R., Sato, H., and Watanabe, Y. “Seismic Retrofitting of ...
  • Chen, L., Zhou, M., and Li, T. “Performance-Based Seismic Retrofit ...
  • Kim, J., Lee, H., and Choi, D. “Integrated Design of ...
  • Wakabayashi, M., et al. “Experimental Studies on Precast Concrete Wall ...
  • Kim, J., and Choi, H. “Behavior and Design of Structures ...
  • Sahoo, D. R., and Chao, S. H. “Performance-Based Plastic Design ...
  • Chang, Y., and Chiu, Y. “Performance Assessment of Buckling Restrained ...
  • Guo, Y. L., Zhang, B. H., Zhu, B. L., Zhou, ...
  • Bing, Q., Xiaofang, M. L., Hetao, H., Canxing, Q., and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع