Exploring the Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Process for Manganese Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Cellulose Acetate Membrane: Response Surface Methodology

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 200

فایل این مقاله در 20 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJCCE-44-4_018

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 خرداد 1404

چکیده مقاله:

In this study, the efficacy of the improved micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration method for the removal of Mn۲+ metal using a cellulose acetate membrane was assessed through Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Box-Behnken design. The membrane, fabricated in the laboratory through the phase inversion method at a room temperature of ۲۵±۱°C, was morphologically characterized using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM). Additionally, (ATR-FTIR) was utilized to examine functional groups and bonds within the membrane structure. Subsequently, surfactants with a Tween ۸۰/SDS ratio of ۰.۳ were employed to generate micelles. The impact of three crucial parameters, including surfactant concentration, molar ratio of surfactant to metal, and pH, as well as their interactions on the removal percentage and permeate flux, was investigated. Analysis of the graphs revealed that an increase in pH and the surfactant-to-metal ratio led to increased rejection. However, the concentration of surfactant exhibited a nuanced relationship: rejection increased up to a value of CS=۹.۲ mM, beyond which rejection decreased. Concerning seepage flux, each operational parameter's increase contributes to its decrease, with the lowest flux occurring when all parameters simultaneously reach their maximum values. In the optimization phase, the highest rejection value was ۹۹.۱۵۶%, accompanied by a flux of ۵.۴۱۱ mL/m۲. s. Simultaneously, at CS=۸.۰۵۲ mM, S/M=۸.۴۷۶, and pH=۷.۲۹, a removal rate of ۹۵.۶۷۹% and a permeate flux of ۴.۱۵۱ mL/m۲.s was observed. Consequently, MEUF technology and the test design method with the fabricated cellulose acetate (CA) membrane provided Mn۲+ removal efficiency of ۹۹% and a flux of ۵.۴۱۱ mL/m۲.s, demonstrating effective Mn²⁺ removal and high membrane flux.

نویسندگان

Saman Khedri

Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, I.R. IRAN

Reza Abedini

Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, I.R. IRAN

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Fan S., Shi J., Sun S., Wang J., Biney B.W., ...
  • Bhateria R., Singh R., A Review on Nanotechnological Application of ...
  • Liu P., Yang Y., Li M., Responses of Soil and ...
  • Yang J., Sun Y., Wang Z., Gong J., Gao J., ...
  • Hong M., Yu L., Wang Y., Zhang J., Chen Z., ...
  • Shrestha R., Ban S., Devkota S., Sharma S., Joshi R., ...
  • Bamforth S.M., Manning D.A., Singleton I., Younger P.L., Johnson K.L., ...
  • Sangle J.S., Marathe K., Removal of Manganese from Wastewater by ...
  • Engwa G.A., Ferdinand P.U., Nwalo F.N., Unachukwu M.N., Mechanism and ...
  • Dey S., Tripathy B., Kumar M.S., Das A.P., Ecotoxicological Consequences ...
  • Liu D., Shi Q., Liu C., Sun Q., Zeng X., ...
  • Taseidifar M., Ziaee M., Pashley R.M., Ninham B.W., Ion Flotation ...
  • Jaafari J., Yaghmaeian K., Optimization of Heavy Metal Biosorption onto ...
  • Ahmed M.J.K., Ahmaruzzaman M., A Review on Potential Usage of ...
  • Patil D.S., Chavan S.M., Oubagaranadin J.U.K., A Review of Technologies ...
  • Aslam A., Thomas-Hall S.R., Mughal T., Zaman Q.-U., Ehsan N., ...
  • Kirkelund G.M., Jensen P.E., Ottosen L.M., Pedersen K.B., Comparison of ...
  • Fu F., Xie L., Tang B., Wang Q., Jiang S., ...
  • Zhang T., Ding L., Ren H., Xiong X., Ammonium Nitrogen ...
  • Verma A.K., Dash R.R., Bhunia P., A Review on Chemical ...
  • Lakshmanan D., Clifford D.A., Samanta G., Comparative Study of Arsenic ...
  • Zhang W., Huang G., Wei J., Yan D., Gemini Micellar ...
  • Verma B., Balomajumder C., Sabapathy M., Gumfekar S.P., Pressure-Driven Membrane ...
  • Razzak S.A., Faruque M.O., Alsheikh Z., Alsheikhmohamad L., Alkuroud D., ...
  • Nachiyar C.V., Rakshi A., Sandhya S., Jebasta N.B.D., Nellore J., ...
  • Asgari G., Abdipour H., Shadjou A., A Review of Novel ...
  • Padma S., Ghosh S., Srinivas B., Ghanta K. C., Dutta ...
  • Xiang H., Min X., Tang C.-J., Sillanpää M., Zhao F., ...
  • Moreno M., Mazur L.P., Weschenfelder S.E., Regis R.J., De Souza ...
  • Hakimzadeh V., Mousavi S.M., Elahi M., Razavi S.M.A., Purification of ...
  • Mungray A.A., Kulkarni S.V., Mungray A.K., Removal of Heavy Metals ...
  • Barakat M., Schmidt E., Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Process for Heavy Metals ...
  • Kurniawan T.A., Chan G.Y., Lo W.-H., Babel S., Physico–Chemical Treatment ...
  • Lin J., Ye W., Baltaru M.-C., Tang Y.P., Bernstein N.J., ...
  • Kenari S.L.D., Barbeau B., Understanding Ultrafiltration Fouling of Ceramic and ...
  • Gentile G.J., Cruz M.C., Rajal V.B., De Cortalezzi M.M.F., Electrostatic ...
  • Santra B., Kar S., Ghosh S., Majumdar S., An Integrated ...
  • Lu R., Zhang C., Piatkovsky M., Ulbricht M., Herzberg M., ...
  • Alpiger S.B., Solet C., Dang T.T., Corredig M., Ultrafiltration of ...
  • Rohani R., Hyland M., Patterson D., A Refined One-Filtration Method ...
  • Mohammad A.W., Ng C.Y., Lim Y.P., Ng G.H., Ultrafiltration in ...
  • Baskaran R., Novel Integrated Ultrafiltration and Reverse Osmosis System in ...
  • Sandu T., Sârbu A., Căprărescu S., Stoica E.-B., Iordache T.-V., ...
  • Kanani D.M., Fissell W.H., Roy S., Dubnisheva A., Fleischman A., ...
  • Awad E.S., Sabirova T.M., Tretyakova N.A., Alsalhy Q.F., Figoli A., ...
  • Zhao B., Li R., Zhong J., Zhang L., Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration ...
  • Mohamed A., Mahfoodh A.-S. M., Solubilization of Naphthalene and Pyrene ...
  • Mehdipour Ghazi M., Hallaji Qomi M., Removal of Manganese from ...
  • Pozniak G., Micellar and Polyelectrolyte Enhanced Ultrafiltration for Removal of ...
  • Rahmanian B., Pakizeh M., Esfandyari M., Heshmatnezhad F., Maskooki A., ...
  • Jana D.K., Roy K., Dey S., Comparative Assessment on Lead ...
  • Lin W., Jing L., Zhang B., Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration to Remove ...
  • Abhari P., Abdi S., Nasiri M., Effect of Various Types ...
  • Rahmanian B., Pakizeh M., Mansoori S.A.A., Abedini R., Application of ...
  • Gokcek O.B., Uzal N., Arsenic Removal by the Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration ...
  • Köker B., Cebeci M. S., Removal of Cr (VI) from ...
  • Landaburu-Aguirre J., Pongrácz E., Perämäki P., Keiski R.L., Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration ...
  • Mohammadi M., Novel Bio-Sorbent for Arsenic Removal from Aqueous Solution: ...
  • Vafaee Baghban M., Zhiani R., Hosseiny M., Nouri S.M.M., Application ...
  • Cao Y., Khan A., Abdi A., Ghadiri M., Combination of ...
  • Rahmanian B., Pakizeh M., Maskooki A., Optimization of Lead Removal ...
  • Palanikumar K., Davim J.P., Electrical Discharge Machining: Study on Machining ...
  • Pinto M.D.C.E., Da Silva D.D., Gomes A.L.A., Leite V.D.S.A., E ...
  • Santos-Sauceda I., Castillo-Ortega M., Del Castillo-Castro T., Armenta-Villegas L., Ramírez-Bon ...
  • Mubashir M., Fong Y., Leng C., Keong L., Enhanced Gases ...
  • Wu H., Fang X., Zhang X., Jiang Z., Ma B., ...
  • Ohno T., Nishio Y., Molecular Orientation and Optical Anisotropy in ...
  • Lee K.-W., Seo B.-K., Nam S.-T., Han M.-J., Trade-off Between ...
  • Pan Y., Pei K., Zhou Y., Liu T., Liu M., ...
  • Paulsen F.G., Shojaie S.S., Krantz W.B., Effect of Evaporation Step ...
  • Saljoughi E., Amirilargani M., Mohammadi T., Effect of PEG Additive ...
  • Maran J.P., Manikandan S., Response Surface Modeling and Optimization of ...
  • Das D., Das T., The "P"-Value: The Primary Alphabet of ...
  • Chen W.-H., Wang Y.-S., Chang M.-H., Show P.L., Hoang A.T., ...
  • Anderson M.J., Whitcomb P.J., RSM Simplified: Optimizing Processes Using Response ...
  • Gülüm M., Yesilyurt M.K., Bilgin A., The Performance Assessment of ...
  • El Batouti M., Al-Harby N.F., Elewa M.M., A Review on ...
  • Bakhshi M., Mortaheb H.R., Amini M.H., Removal of Trace Metal ...
  • Nayerabadi A., Abdi S., Nasiri M., Removal of Lead Ions ...
  • Yaqub M., Lee S.H., Experimental and Neural Network Modeling of ...
  • Sum J., Kok W., Shalini T., The Removal Selectivity of ...
  • Khoshdast H., Soflaeian A., Shojaei V., Coupled Fuzzy Logic and ...
  • Musa S.A., Abdulhameed A.S., Baharin S.N.A., Alothman Z.A., Wilson L.D., ...
  • Sohan S., Lee S.H., Lee T.K., Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF): ...
  • Iqbal J., Kim H.-J., Yang J.-S., Baek K., Yang J.-W., ...
  • Huang J., Peng L., Zeng G., Li X., Zhao Y., ...
  • Chhatre A., Marathe K., Dynamic Analysis and Optimization of Surfactant ...
  • Bade R., Lee S. H., Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration and Activated ...
  • Liu C.-K., Li C.-W., Combined Electrolysis and Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ...
  • Daniş Ü., Keskinler B., Chromate Removal from Wastewater Using Micellar ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع