The Persian version of caregiver self-efficacy scale (CSES): A psychometric evaluation among family caregivers of patients with cancer

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 41

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JGBFNM-22-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 15 خرداد 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Family caregivers of cancer patients encounter numerous challenges while providing care, and self-efficacy is a key factor in alleviating these negative effects. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) among caregivers of cancer patients. Methods: This methodological study employed a cross-sectional design involving ۳۸۲ family caregivers of cancer patients in a teaching hospital in Iran, in ۲۰۲۴. The CSES was translated into Persian using the forward-backward procedure. The initial translation was assessed for face and content validity through both quantitative and qualitative methods. Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Discriminant validity was examined using the Heterotrait–Monotrait (HTMT) ratio. Reliability was assessed by evaluating internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and Mcdonald's omega, and stability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: In this study, ۵۳.۷% of the participants were male, and the caregivers' mean age was ۴۲.۵۲ ± ۱۱.۸۳ years. Scale-level content validity index was reported ۰.۹۷ by expert panel during content validity stage. During the exploratory factor analysis, one item was excluded, leaving seven items were categorized into two factors: caregiver self-management and patient challenges. These factors collectively accounted for ۴۳.۹% of the variance in self-efficacy. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the adequacy of the model derived from the exploratory factor analysis (RMSEA = ۰.۰۵, GFI = ۰.۹۴۷, and CFI = ۰.۹۰۶). The factors demonstrated discriminant validity.  Cronbach's alpha values for the patient challenges and caregiver self-management factors were ۰.۸۰۲ and ۰.۷۹۸, respectively. In addition, the ICC for these two factors was reported to be ۰.۸۳۰ and ۰.۸۰۲, respectively. Conclusion: The Persian adaptation of the CSES demonstrates satisfactory validity and reliability for assessing the self-efficacy of family caregivers of cancer patients in Iran.

نویسندگان

Seyedmohammad Mirhosseini

Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran ; Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Ali Abbasi

Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Anahita Divani

Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Fateme Askarinezhad

Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Soheila Hasanpournamaghi

Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Samuel Grimwood

Human Sciences Research Centre, The University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom

Ali Montazeri

Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Hossein Ebrahimi

Center for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Mirhosseini S, Bazghaleh M, Basirinezhad MH, Abbasi A, Ebrahimi H. ...
  • Guerra-Martín MD, Casado-Espinosa MDR, Gavira-López Y, Holgado-Castro C, López-Latorre I, ...
  • Abuatiq A, Brown R, Wolles B, Randall R. Perceptions of ...
  • Palacio Gonzalez C, Roman‐Calderón JP, Limonero JT. The relationship between ...
  • Zhang Y, Zhang S, Liu C, Chen X, Ding Y, ...
  • Zhu Y, Pei X, Chen X, Li T. Family caregivers' ...
  • Paterson C, Roberts C, Li J, Chapman M, Strickland K, ...
  • Bijnsdorp FM, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Boot CR, van der Beek AJ, ...
  • Oliveira C, Lourenço D, Sotero L, Relvas AP. Caregivers' concerns ...
  • Cai Y, Simons A, Toland S, Zhang J, Zheng K. ...
  • Lee Y, Li L. Evaluating the positive experience of caregiving: ...
  • Nemcikova M, Katreniakova Z, Nagyova I. Social support, positive caregiving ...
  • Lv Q, Zhang X, Wang Y, Xu X, Zang X. ...
  • Phongtankuel V, Moxley J, Reid M, Adelman RD, Czaja SJ. ...
  • Hebdon MCT, Coombs LA, Reed P, Crane TE, Badger TA. ...
  • Sato H, Nakaaki S, Sato J, Shikimoto R, Furukawa TA, ...
  • Zeiss AM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Lovett S, Rose J, McKibbin C. ...
  • Steffen AM, McKibbin C, Zeiss AM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Bandura A. ...
  • Merluzzi TV, Philip EJ, Vachon DO, Heitzmann CA. Assessment of ...
  • Ritter P, Sheth K, Stewart A, Gallagher-Thompson D, Lorig K. ...
  • Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia:lippincott williams ...
  • Mirhosseini S, Moslemi F, Sharif-Nia H, Minaei-Moghadam S, Khajeh M, ...
  • Gudmundsson E. Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic ...
  • Mirhosseini S, Ameri F, Rahmani H, Sharif-Nia H, Fazel G, ...
  • Polit-O'Hara D, Hungler BP. Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, ...
  • Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. ...
  • Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research. New York:Springer ...
  • Mabel OA, Olayemi OS. A comparison of principal component analysis, ...
  • Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate ...
  • Feng P, Yang H-L, Xu L, Ojo O, Lu X-Y, ...
  • Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor ...
  • Sharif-Nia H, Sivarajan Froelicher E, She L, Jafari-Koulaee A, Hejazi ...
  • Franke G, Sarstedt M. Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity ...
  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for ...
  • Cho E. Neither Cronbach's alpha nor McDonald's omega: A commentary ...
  • Kalkbrenner MT. Alpha, omega, and H internal consistency reliability estimates: ...
  • Zygmont C, Smith MR. Robust factor analysis in the presence ...
  • Zhang SY, Edwards H, Yates P, Ruth E, Guo Q. ...
  • Serpentini S, Guandalini B, Tosin G, Ronconi L, Cristaldi G, ...
  • Kazanowski M. Family caregivers' medication management of symptoms in patients ...
  • Lewandowska A, Rudzki G, Lewandowski T, Rudzki S. The problems ...
  • Cheng HL, Leung DYP, Ko PS, Lam WM, Lam PT, ...
  • Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu Rev ...
  • Zhang SY, Edwards H, Yates P, Ruth E, Guo QH. ...
  • Jun WH, Cha KS, Lee KL. The mediating effect of ...
  • De Maria M, Iovino P, Lorini S, Ausili D, Matarese ...
  • Lee JY, Chang HK. Factors influencing family caregivers' self-management of ...
  • Hong M, Kim K, Casado BL. Psychometric evaluation of the ...
  • Suwanno J, Klinjun N, Srisomthrong K, Kelly M, Mayeng M, ...
  • Greenhawt M, DunnGalvin A. Preliminary psychometric analyses and clinical performance ...
  • Márquez-González M, Losada A, López J, Peñacoba C. Reliability and ...
  • Giromini L, Young G, Sellbom M. Assessing negative response bias ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع