Secondary Ulnar Nerve Reconstruction of High Ulnar Nerve Injuries: A Comparative Study of Sural Grafting and Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer
محل انتشار: مجله استخوان و جراحی عمومی، دوره: 13، شماره: 6
سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 25
فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_TABO-13-6_006
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 12 خرداد 1404
چکیده مقاله:
Objectives: High ulnar nerve injuries often cause severe functional impairment, and the best secondary repair method remains debated. This study compared the effectiveness of sural nerve grafting and anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) transfer following failed primary ulnar nerve repairs .Methods: This retrospective cohort study included ۴۲ patients with isolated high ulnar nerve injuries who required secondary surgical intervention. Patients were allocated to either the sural nerve grafting (n = ۲۳) or AIN transfer (n = ۱۹) group based on predefined clinical criteria. Motor and sensory functions were assessed using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system and a two-point discrimination (۲PD) test. Grip and pinch strength were measured, and functional recovery was evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: The AIN transfer group exhibited significantly superior motor recovery, with ۶۸.۵% of patients achieving BMRC grades M۴–M۵, compared to only ۱۷.۴% in the sural grafting group (P = ۰.۰۳). Sensory recovery was also markedly better in the AIN group, with a higher proportion of patients reaching BMRC sensory grades S۳–S۴ (P = ۰.۰۴). Additionally, the AIN transfer group demonstrated significantly greater grip strength (۳۰.۱ ± ۶.۱ kg vs. ۲۴.۳ ± ۵.۲ kg; P = ۰.۰۳) and pinch strength (۷.۲ ± ۱.۵ kg vs. ۵.۸ ± ۱.۳ kg; P = ۰.۰۴). Improvement in DASH scores was more substantial in the AIN group (–۲۶.۶ ± ۵.۷ vs. –۱۴.۶ ± ۴.۳; P = ۰.۰۲), indicating better functional recovery. Although the AIN group showed a trend toward improved ۲PD, the difference was not statistically significant (P = ۰.۱۸). Conclusion: AIN transfer provides superior outcomes compared to sural nerve grafting for the secondary repair of high ulnar nerve injuries, demonstrating significantly enhanced motor and sensory recovery, grip and pinch strength, and overall functional improvement. Level of evidence: III
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Ali Dehghan Marvast
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Mohsen Aliakbari
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Amir Mohammad Monzavi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Ashkan Salehi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Mohammad Shahsavan
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :