Foucaultian reading of Panopticon and anticapitalism in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale

فایل این در 26 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این :

چکیده :

Margaret Atwood’s (1939) The Handmaid’s Tale (1985) presents a dystopian society, Gilead, where surveillance and oppression are institutionalized. This paper offers a Foucaultian reading of the novel, examining how the panoptic mechanism disciplines and controls individuals, particularly women, under a theocratic regime. Michel Foucault’s concept of the panopticon elucidates the pervasive surveillance in Gilead, where constant observation ensures subjugation and internalized obedience. The Handmaids, stripped of autonomy, become self-regulating subjects under the ever-watchful eye of the state, mirroring Foucault’s analysis of power and discipline in modern institutions. Additionally, the novel critiques capitalism by exposing its collapse and replacement with a totalitarian system that commodifies women’s bodies, reducing them to reproductive instruments. Atwood’s depiction of economic exploitation aligns with anticapitalist discourse, revealing how capitalist structures can evolve into oppressive regimes under authoritarian rule. Through a Foucauldian lens, this study highlights the intersections of surveillance, biopolitics, and resistance in The Handmaid’s Tale, emphasizing its relevance to contemporary discussions on power, gender, and economic inequality.

نویسندگان

مدیر گروه زبان انگلیسی واحد جیرفت

امیرحسین شریفی

دانشجو ارشد زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی

مراجع و منابع این :

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود لینک شده اند :
  • Giroux, H. A. (2015). Dangerous thinking in the age of ...
  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare ...
  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of ...
  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard University Press. ...
  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment ...
  • Howells, C. A. (2005). Margaret Atwood. Palgrave Macmillan. ...
  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late ...
  • Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster ...
  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: ...
  • Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a ...
  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of ...
  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848/2018). The communist manifesto (S. ...
  • Pishkar, K. (2016). The linguistic nuances of persuasion in Shakespeare’s ...
  • Pishkar, K. (2017). Postmodern narrative techniques in Julian Barnes’s The ...
  • Pishkar, K. (2018). The crisis of identity in postcolonial literature: ...
  • Pishkar, K. (2020). The intersection of feminism and dystopia in ...
  • Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. Pantheon Books. ...
  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books. ...
  • Sargent, L. T. (1994). The three faces of utopianism revisited. ...
  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. ...
  • Staples, W. G. (2014). Everyday surveillance: Vigilance and visibility in ...
  • Stein, K. F. (1996). Margaret Atwood’s modern Handmaid’s Tale: Feminist ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع