University Students' Perspectives on Synchronous, Asynchronous, and Combined Virtual Learning Environments: Lessons Learned from the COVID-۱۹ Pandemic

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 213

فایل این مقاله در 18 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_MEDIA-16-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 فروردین 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Background: The COVID-۱۹ pandemic significantly transformed higher education, shifting learning to digital platforms. This study explored university students’ perceptions of synchronous, asynchronous, and combined virtual learning during this period.Methods: This mixed-methods study involved surveying ۳۶۱ students and conducting interviews with ۱۵ individuals from September ۲۰۲۰ to July ۲۰۲۱ to explore undergraduate students’ attitudes and perceptions of asynchronous, synchronous, and combined virtual learning. Quantitative data from questionnaires were analyzed using t-tests, while qualitative data from interviews were analyzed using an empirical phenomenological approach. The questionnaire was distributed during the second academic semester, while interviews were conducted at the end of the second semester.Results: The findings revealed that students perceive combined communication as a more effective and high-quality method of learning compared to asynchronous and synchronous communication. The combined communication method was rated with a total mean of ۳.۵۸. In contrast, the asynchronous communication method was rated with a total mean of ۳.۰۲, and the synchronous communication method was rated with a total mean of ۲.۷۲. This could be attributed to the integration of traditional classroom learning with reflective techniques and the complementary use of both synchronous and asynchronous communication methods. Additionally, students have indicated that asynchronous communication is an effective means of compensating for missed synchronous classes and serves as a valuable backup in the event of technical issues. The combined communication also demonstrated advantages in time management, flexibility, and accelerated progress toward learning objectives. Furthermore, it helped maintain engagement by reducing repetitive content, boredom, and motivational slumps.Conclusion: This research suggests that educators teaching online courses should adopt a multi-modal communication strategy to address the limitations of each approach. By employing a range of communication methods, professors can leverage the strengths of each approach while mitigating its weaknesses.

نویسندگان

Rasoul Bakhtiari

Department of Education, MehrAlborz University, Tehran, Iran

Zahra Habibzadeh

Department of Education, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Hamutoglu NB, Gemikonakli O, Duman I, Kirksekiz A, Kiyici M. ...
  • Caprara L, Caprara C. Effects of virtual learning environments: A ...
  • Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than ...
  • Πέλλας Ν, Kazanidis I. On the value of Second Life ...
  • Zeng H, Luo J. Effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous online ...
  • Dargahi H, Kooshkebaghi M, Mireshghollah M. Learner satisfaction with synchronous ...
  • Zhang R, Bi NC, Mercado T. Do Zoom meetings really ...
  • Persada SF, Prasetyo YT, Suryananda XV, Apriyansyah B, Ong AKS, ...
  • Alzahrani HA, Shati AA, Bawahab MA, Alamri AA, Hassan B, ...
  • Dung DTH. The advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. IOSR ...
  • Xie H, Liu W, Bhairma J. Analysis of synchronous and ...
  • Branon RF, Essex C. Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in ...
  • Yadav SK, Para S, Singh G, Gupta R, Sarin N, ...
  • Nieuwoudt JE. Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors ...
  • Hew KF, Cheung WS. Evaluating the participation and quality of ...
  • Davidson-Shivers G, Tanner E, Muilenburg L. How Do Students Participate ...
  • Huang X, Hsiao E-L. Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an ...
  • Pinto-Llorente AM, Sánchez-Gómez MC, García-Peñalvo FJ, Casillas-Martín S. Students’ perceptions ...
  • Murphy E, Rodríguez‐Manzanares MA, Barbour M. Asynchronous and synchronous online ...
  • van der Keylen P, Lippert N, Kunisch R, Kühlein T, ...
  • Caspi A, Chajut E, Saporta K, Beyth-Marom R. The influence ...
  • Giesbers B, Rienties B, Tempelaar D, Gijselaers W. A dynamic ...
  • Villanueva ME, Camilli E, Chirillano AC, Cufré JA, de Landeta ...
  • Salmon G. E-tivities: The key to active online learning. UK: ...
  • Burnett C. Learning to chat: Tutor participation in synchronous online ...
  • Blau I, Weiser O, Eshet-Alkalai Y. How do medium naturalness ...
  • Yamagata-Lynch LC. Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. Int Rev ...
  • Wang J, Wang Y. Compare synchronous and asynchronous online instruction ...
  • Moallem M. The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools ...
  • Wang Q, Huang C, Quek CL. Students’ perspectives on the ...
  • Hoq MZ. E-Learning during the period of pandemic (COVID-۱۹) in ...
  • Sleiwah A, Mughal M, Hachach-Haram N, Roblin P. COVID-۱۹ lockdown ...
  • Perveen A. Synchronous and Asynchronous E-language Learning: A Case Study ...
  • Stuart J, O’Donnell AW, Scott R, O’Donnell K, Lund R, ...
  • Johnson G. Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational contexts: ...
  • Moorhouse BL, Wong KM. Blending asynchronous and synchronous digital technologies ...
  • Amiri Y, Khademi N, Khafri FZ, Akbari Z, Jangjoo R. ...
  • Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing ...
  • Ivankova N V, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential ...
  • Krejcie R V, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research ...
  • Curtis DD, Keeves JP. The Course Experience Questionnaire as an ...
  • Harris K-L, James R. The Course Experience Questionnaire, Graduate Destination ...
  • Poon J. Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ ...
  • Thien LM, Ong MY. The applicability of course experience questionnaire ...
  • Schwarzenberg P, Navon J, Pérez-Sanagustín M. Models to provide guidance ...
  • Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods. USA: Sage; ۱۹۹۴ ...
  • Lunenburg FC, Irby BJ. Writing a successful thesis or dissertation: ...
  • Vanderstoep SW, Johnson DD. Research methods for everyday life: Blending ...
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. ...
  • Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. J Posit Psychol. ۲۰۱۷;۱۲(۳):۲۹۷–۸. ...
  • Lim CL, She L, Hassan N. The impact of live ...
  • Schwier R, Balbar S. The interplay of content and community ...
  • Peterson AT, Beymer PN, Putnam RT. Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: ...
  • Demirtaş BK, Türk U. Student performance under asynchronous and synchronous ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع