A global perspective on sustainable pathways for biogas adoption

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 121

فایل این مقاله در 32 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_GJESM-11-2_025

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 فروردین 1404

چکیده مقاله:

Biogas technology has been developed worldwide in recent decades to provide affordable, secure, and clean energy in rural and developing regions. The technology presents various advantages, as it can be utilized for heating, generating power, and functioning as both a fuel and a raw material in the chemical manufacturing process. However, its widespread adoption remains hindered by complex social, economic, and environmental challenges. Local acceptance is increasingly becoming a critical factor for biogas projects and the transition to renewable energy. The objective of this systematic review is to explore and assess the diverse factors that contribute to the acceptance of biogas, utilizing publications from the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases for analysis. The study examined the connections among authors, disciplines, and geographic regions to contextualize the findings within the global framework. A visualization of similarities and Java-based software was utilized to map the trends in co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic developments from ۲۰۱۳ to ۲۰۲۴. Adopting the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses methodology, ۱,۳۵۸ studies were screened, resulting in ۲۰ peer-reviewed publications meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of ۲۴۸ factors influencing the acceptance of biogas were identified and clustered along the three sustainability dimensions. Biogas projects are influenced by social, environmental, and economic factors in distinct ways depending on the country or region. The weight scores within each dimension were normalized and the overall score of the studies were calculated, allowing for a comparability of the studies. The finding reveals that social factors are the most significant determinants of biogas adoption, including public trust, procedural justice, and community involvement, accounting for ۴۵ percent of the total. Financial aspects, including incentives, operational costs, and market conditions represent ۳۱ percent. The remaining ۲۴ percent was comprised of environmental factors that received the lowest overall scores, including emission reduction, resource compatibility, and land use impacts. This indicates that the environmental drivers are less emphasized than the other two dimensions. The study emphasizes the critical significance of local governance, the engagement of stakeholders, and the implementation of strategic communication in facilitating the uptake of biogas. Perceived benefits, equity in decision-making, and accessible financial mechanisms emerged as key enablers, while barriers included mistrust, lack of awareness, uneven decision-making, and cost constraints. The significance of tailoring strategies to local conditions is highlighted by regional disparities. In Europe, the focus is on policy alignment, stakeholder governance, and sophisticated infrastructure, whereas developing regions emphasize affordability, education, and resource accessibility. The study highlights the necessity of an integrated approach that considers social, economic, and environmental dimensions, providing actionable insight to ensure equitable and sustainable biogas implementation.

نویسندگان

K. Biró

ASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom ۷۳۱۷۰, Thailand

K.S. Woon

Carbon Neutrality and Climate Change Thrust, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China

W. Ounsaneha

Faculty of Science and Technology, Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage, Klong Nuang, Klong Luang, Pathumthani ۱۳۱۸۰, Thailand

C. Rattanapan

ASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom ۷۳۱۷۰, Thailand

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Achinas, S.; Achinas, V.; Euverink, G.J.W., (۲۰۱۷). A technological overview ...
  • Ahmed, N.; Qamar, S.; Jabeen, G.; Yan, Q.; Ahmad, M., ...
  • Alasti, E., (۲۰۱۱). IIIEE Master thesis IMEN۴۱ ۲۰۱۱۲. The International ...
  • Alberto Huerta-Reynoso, E.; Alfredo López-Aguilar, H.; Alberto Gómez, J.; Guadalupe ...
  • ALFA, (۲۰۲۴). Engagement platform. Biogas model, Program v. ۱ ...
  • Arthur, R.; Baidoo, M.F.; Brew-Hammond, A.; Bensah, E.C., (۲۰۱۱). Biogas ...
  • Assefa, G.; Frostell, B., (۲۰۰۷). Social sustainability and social acceptance ...
  • Bang, H.K.; Ellinger, A.E.; Hadjimarcou, J.; Traichal, P.A., (۲۰۰۰). Consumer ...
  • Batel, S.; Devine-Wright, P.; Tangeland, T., (۲۰۱۳). Social acceptance of ...
  • Baur, D.; Emmerich, P.; Baumann, M.J.; Weil, M., (۲۰۲۲). Assessing ...
  • Bidwell, D., (۲۰۱۳). The role of values in public beliefs ...
  • Bourdin, S.; Colas, M.; Raulin, F., (۲۰۱۹). Understanding the problems ...
  • Bourdin, S.; Raulin, F.; Josset, C., (۲۰۲۰). On the (un)successful ...
  • Brohmann, B.; Feenstra, Y.; Heiskanen, E.; Hodson, M.; Mourik, R.; ...
  • Chojnacka, K.; Moustakas, K., (۲۰۲۴). Anaerobic digestate management for carbon ...
  • Coll-Martínez, E.; Labrouche, G.; Nadel, S.; Orozco, L., (۲۰۲۴). Regional ...
  • Danya, U.; Kamaraj, M.; Suresh Babu, P.; Aravind, J., (۲۰۲۴). ...
  • De Groot, J.I.M.; Steg, L.; Poortinga, W., (۲۰۱۳). Values, perceived ...
  • Dermont, C.; Ingold, K.; Kammermann, L.; Stadelmann-Steffen, I., (۲۰۱۷). Bringing ...
  • Devine-Wright, P., (۲۰۰۵). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for ...
  • Devine-Wright, P., (۲۰۰۹). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment ...
  • Dobers, G.M., (۲۰۱۹). Acceptance of biogas plants taking into account ...
  • Domac, J., (۲۰۰۲). Bioenergy and job creation. Unasylva, ۲۱۱: ۱۸-۱۹ ...
  • Dumont, K.B.; Hildebrandt, D.; Sempuga, B.C., (۲۰۲۱). The yuck factor ...
  • European Biogas Association, (۲۰۲۴a). Statistical Report ۲۰۲۴ (۷۲ pages) ...
  • European Biogas Association, (۲۰۲۴b). European Biomethane Map ۲۰۲۴ ...
  • Emmann, C.H.; Arens, L.; Theuvsen, L., (۲۰۱۳). Individual acceptance of ...
  • Emmann, C.H.; Theuvsen, L., (۲۰۱۲). Impact of biogas production on ...
  • European Biomass Association, (۲۰۱۷). Statistical report. European bioenergy outlook. Key findings. ...
  • European Commission, (۲۰۲۳). Communication from the commission to the european ...
  • Eurostat, (۲۰۲۴). Natural gas supply statistics, May ۲۰۲۴ ...
  • Farstad, M.; Otte, P.P.; Palmer, E., (۲۰۲۴). Socio-cultural conditions for ...
  • Feiz, R.; Metson, G.S.; Wretman, J.; Ammenberg, J., (۲۰۲۲). Key ...
  • Fytili, D.; Zabaniotou, A., (۲۰۱۷). Social acceptance of bioenergy in ...
  • Gabisa, E.W.; Gheewala, S.H., (۲۰۱۹). Potential, environmental, and socio-economic assessment ...
  • Gareiou, Z.; Drimili, E.; Zervas, E., (۲۰۲۱). ۱۲ - Public ...
  • Gosling, D., (۱۹۸۲). Biogas for Thailand’s rural development: Transferring the ...
  • Haidt, J., (۲۰۰۱). The emotional dog and its rational tail: ...
  • Haseeb, M., (۲۰۱۹). Analysis of biogas technology adoption at household ...
  • Hernik, J.; Noszczyk, T.; Rutkowska, A., (۲۰۱۹). Towards a better ...
  • IEA, (۲۰۲۰). Outlook for biogas and biomethane: Prospects for organic ...
  • IEA, (۲۰۲۳). Renewables ۲۰۲۳, IEA, Paris (۱۴۳ pages) ...
  • IEA, (۲۰۲۴). Renewables ۲۰۲۴, IEA, Paris (۱۷۷ pages) ...
  • IEA Bioenergy, (۲۰۱۷). Methane emissions from biogas plants, Methods for ...
  • IESR (۲۰۱۹). Indonesia clean energy outlook tracking progress and review ...
  • IPCC, (۲۰۲۱). AR۶ Climate Change ۲۰۲۱: The Physical Science Basis. ...
  • Jabeen, G.; Yan, Q.; Ahmad, M.; Fatima, N.; Jabeen, M.; ...
  • Jameel, M.K.; Mustafa M.A.; Ahmed H.S.; Mohammed Aj.; Ghazy H.; ...
  • K House, H.; DeBruyn, J.; Jack, R., (۲۰۰۷). A survey ...
  • Kaldellis, J.K., (۲۰۰۵). Social attitude towards wind energy applications in ...
  • Kasperson, R.E.; Ram, B.J., (۲۰۱۳). The public acceptance of new ...
  • Kortsch, T.; Hildebrand, J.; Schweizer-Ries, P., (۲۰۱۵). Acceptance of biomass ...
  • Kromus, S.; Wachter, B.; Koschuh, W.; Mandl, M.; Krotscheck, C.; ...
  • Kulla, M.; Novotny, L.; Pregi, L., (۲۰۲۲). The role and ...
  • Lantz, M.; Svensson, M.; Björnsson, L.; Börjesson, P., (۲۰۰۷). The ...
  • Luo, T.; Shen, B.; Mei, Z.; Hove, A.; Ju, K., ...
  • Mancini E.; Raggi A., (۲۰۲۲). Out of sight, out of ...
  • Maphosa, M.; Maphosa, V., (۲۰۲۲). A bibliometric analysis of the ...
  • McCormick, K., (۲۰۱۰). Communicating bioenergy: A growing challenge. Biofuels, Bioprod. ...
  • Meidiana, C.; Hidayah, A.; Wijayanti, W.P., (۲۰۲۰). Factors influencing the ...
  • Mercer-Mapstone, L.; Rifkin, W.; Louis, W.R.; Moffat, K., (۲۰۱۸). Company-community ...
  • Miltner, M.; Makaruk, A.; Harasek, M., (۲۰۱۷). Review on available ...
  • Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G., (۲۰۰۹). The ...
  • Moula, M.E.; Maula, J.; Hamdy, M.; Fang, T.; Jung, N.; ...
  • Mukeshimana, M.C.; Zhao, Z.-Y.; Ahmad, M.; Irfan, M., (۲۰۲۱). Analysis ...
  • Mühl, D.D.; de Oliveira, L., (۲۰۲۲). Features of anaerobic digestion ...
  • Nadaï, A., (۲۰۰۷). “Planning”, “siting” and the local acceptance of ...
  • Nathalie Bachmann, E.S.A., (۲۰۱۳). ۸ - Design and engineering of ...
  • Ni, J.-Q.; Nyns, E.-J., (۱۹۹۶). New concept for the evaluation ...
  • Nielsen, M.B., (۲۰۲۲). Identifying challenges and drivers for deployment of ...
  • Nielsen, M.B.; Lybæk, R.; Kjær, T., (۲۰۲۲). Successfully navigating the ...
  • Nisbet, E.G.; Fisher, R.E.; Lowry, D.; France, J.L.; Allen, G.; ...
  • Nsair, A.; Onen Cinar, S.; Alassali, A.; Abu Qdais, H.; ...
  • Oliveira, H.R.; Kozlowsky-Suzuki, B.; Björn, A.; Shakeri Yekta, S.; Caetano, ...
  • Obaideen, K.; Abdelkareem, M.A.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Sayed, E.T.; ...
  • Ortiz, W.; Terrapon-Pfaff, J.; Dienst, C., (۲۰۱۷). Understanding the diffusion ...
  • Osei-Marfo, M.; Awuah, E.; de Vries, N.K., (۲۰۱۸). Biogas technology ...
  • Page, M.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; ...
  • Paolini, V.; Petracchini, F.; Segreto, M.; Tomassetti, L.; Naja, N.; ...
  • Parikh, J.K.; Parikh, K.S., (۱۹۷۷). Mobilization and impacts of bio-gas ...
  • Patinvoh, R.J.; Taherzadeh, M.J., (۲۰۱۹). Challenges of biogas implementation in ...
  • Perlaviciute, G.; Steg, L., (۲۰۱۵). The influence of values on ...
  • Perlaviciute, G.; Steg, L.; Contzen, N.; Roeser, S.; Huijts, N., ...
  • Plieninger, T.; Bens, O.; Hüttl, R.F., (۲۰۰۶). Perspectives of bioenergy ...
  • Pollesch, N.L.; Dale, V.H., (۲۰۱۶). Normalization in sustainability assessment: Methods ...
  • Rahman, M.M.; Hasan, M.M.; Paatero, J.V.; Lahdelma, R., (۲۰۱۴). Hybrid ...
  • Razinkov, M.I.; Zhukova, A.A.; Jovanovich, S.; Sorokin, D.E.; Saidmurodova, M.A.; ...
  • Roberts, R.C., (۲۰۰۱). Emotions: An essay in aid of moral ...
  • Rocha-Meneses, L.; Luna-delRisco, M.; González, C.A.; Moncada, S.V.; Moreno, A.; ...
  • Roeser, S., (۲۰۱۱). Moral emotions and intuitions. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, ...
  • Scarlat, N.; Dallemand, J.-F.; Monforti-Ferrario, F.; Banja, M.; Motola, V., ...
  • Scheutz, C.; Fredenslund, A.M., (۲۰۱۹). Total methane emission rates and ...
  • Segreto, M.; Principe, L.; Desormeaux, A.; Torre, M.; Tomassetti, L.; ...
  • Segreto, M.; Torre, M.; Tratzi, P.; Tomassetti, L.; Paolini, V.; ...
  • Sharpton, T.; Lawrence, T.; Hall, M., (۲۰۲۰). Drivers and barriers ...
  • Sims, R.E.H., (۲۰۰۳). Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and ...
  • Situmeang, R.; Mazancová, J.; Roubík, H., (۲۰۲۲). Technological, economic, social ...
  • Soland, M.; Steimer, N.; Walter, G., (۲۰۱۳). Local acceptance of ...
  • Soleas, E., (۲۰۲۱). Environmental factors impacting the motivation to innovate: ...
  • Sumiyati, S.; Samadikun, B.P.; Widiyanti, A.; Budihardjo, M.A.; Al Qadar, ...
  • Surendra, K.C.; Takara, D.; Hashimoto, A.G.; Khanal, S.K., (۲۰۱۴). Biogas ...
  • Terwel, B.; Harinck, F.; Ellemers, N.; Daamen, D., (۲۰۱۱). Going ...
  • Thanh Truc, N.; Tran, N.; Nguyen Vo Chau, N.; Bentzen, ...
  • Timonen, K.; Reinikainen, A.; Kurppa, S.; Riipi, I., (۲۰۲۱). Key ...
  • Torres-Ceron D.A.; Amaya-Roncancio S.; Fuentes-Gandara F.; Restrepo-Parra E.; Bohorquez-Santiago L.; ...
  • Twyhues, P.T., (۲۰۲۰) Become aware and take care - social acceptance ...
  • Upham, P.; Oltra, C.; Boso, À., (۲۰۱۵). Towards a cross-paradigmatic ...
  • van der Horst, D., (۲۰۰۷). NIMBY or not? Exploring the ...
  • van Dijk, M.; Goedegebure, R.; Nap, J.-P., (۲۰۲۴). Public acceptance ...
  • van Eck N.J.; Waltman, L., (۲۰۱۸). VOSviewer Manual. Manual for ...
  • Velásquez Piñas, J.A.; Venturini, O.J.; Silva Lora, E.E.; del Olmo, ...
  • Venko, B., (۲۰۲۲). Biogas production: evaluation and possible applications. In ...
  • Walekhwa, P.N.; Mugisha, J.; Drake, L., (۲۰۰۹). Biogas energy from ...
  • Wexler, M.N., (۱۹۹۶). A sociological framing of the NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) ...
  • Wu, J.; Atchike, D.W.; Ahmad, M., (۲۰۲۳). Crucial adoption factors ...
  • Wüstenhagen, R.; Wolsink, M.; Bürer, M.J., (۲۰۰۷). Social acceptance of ...
  • Zabaniotou, A., (۲۰۱۸). Redesigning a bioenergy sector in EU in ...
  • Xue, S.; Song, J.; Wang, X.; Shang, Z.; Sheng, C.; ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع