A Comparison of the Effect of Vitrification on the Morphology of Stimulated and Non-stimulated Human Ovaries
محل انتشار: مجله تحقیقات پاتوبیولوژی، دوره: 18، شماره: 3
سال انتشار: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 160
فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_PRJMS-18-3_002
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 اسفند 1403
چکیده مقاله:
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vitrification on the morphology of human ovarian tissue in a stimulated group compared to a non-stimulated group.
Methods: Ovarian cortex biopsies collected from stimulated and non-stimulated groups were transported to the laboratory in L-۱۵ medium. Biopsies were cut into small pieces and divided randomly into the vitrified and non-vitrified subgroups. The vitrified-warmed and fresh samples were fixed using Bouin’s solution, then passaged, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome. The follicles at different developmental stages were counted and evaluated.
Results: Morphological observations showed that the follicles and stromal tissue had well preserved normal structures after vitrification and warming. The percentage of normal follicles in the non-stimulated non-vitrified group was ۸۹.۲۲%; for the non-stimulated vitrified group, it was ۸۴.۶۰%. In previous groups the proportion of primordial follicles were ۶۸.۷ ± ۱.۶۰% and ۶۷.۸۰ ± ۳.۷۱%, primary follicles were ۲۸.۶۰ ± ۱.۷۲% and ۲۹.۴۰ ± ۳.۵۱%, and secondary follicles were ۳.۶۰ ± ۰.۶۶% and ۲.۷۰ ± ۱.۲۰%, respectively. The percentage of normal follicles in the stimulated non-vitrified group was ۸۸.۱۸%; for the stimulated vitrified group, it was ۸۴.۱۹%. In stimulated non-vitrified and stimulated vitrified groups the proportion of primordial follicles were ۴۹.۷۰ ± ۴.۱۳% and ۴۹.۳۴ ± ۲.۸۶%, primary follicles were ۴۴.۵۰ ± ۳.۸۳% and ۴۴.۷۲ ± ۲.۶۸%, and secondary follicles were ۵.۶۰ ± ۰.۷۲% and ۵.۹۱ ± ۰.۷۷%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the vitrified and non-vitrified and stimulated and non-stimulated groups.
Conclusion: Vitrification had no harmful effect on the morphology of stimulated human ovarian tissue and stroma and ovarain tissue structure was similar to the non-stimulated group. This method could be a good alternative for fertility preservation.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
مهدی رمضانی
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
مژده صالح نیا
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
مینا جعفر آبادی
Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center (IRHRC), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :