Comparison of retention in polyvinyl siloxane matrix systems versus conventional metal housing with nylon inserts in ball-retained mandibular implant overdentures

سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 160

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JDMT-14-1_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 اسفند 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Objective: This study compared the retentive performance of two polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) matrix systems (retention.sil ۴۰۰ and ۶۰۰) versus conventional metal housing with nylon inserts in ball-retained mandibular overdentures.Methods: Thirty ball-retained overdenture models were allocated into three groups based on the attachment system material (n=۱۰): Group ۱, conventional metal housing with nylon inserts; Group ۲, retention.sil ۴۰۰; and Group ۳, retention.sil ۶۰۰. A total of ۱۴۴۰ insertion-removal cycles, simulating one year of clinical use, were conducted at ۵۰ mm/sec using a universal testing machine. Retention forces were measured at baseline (۰ cycles) and after ۳۶۰, ۷۲۰, ۱۰۸۰, and ۱۴۴۰ cycles. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Tukey's test at a significance level of P<۰.۰۵.Results: The conventional group showed the highest retention at all cycles. There were statistically significant differences in retention between the conventional group and both PVS groups at all cycles (P<۰.۰۰۱), but no significant differences were found between the two PVS groups (P>۰.۰۵). Absolute retention loss was significantly greater in the conventional metal housing with nylon inserts than in the two PVS groups (P<۰.۰۰۱). No significant difference was found in relative retention loss among the groups (P=۰.۱۰۸).Conclusions: Conventional metal housing with nylon inserts provided superior mean retention compared to the retention.sil ۴۰۰ and retention.sil ۶۰۰ matrix systems at all cycles, with no significant difference between the two PVS materials. The relative retention loss, however, did not significantly differ between the conventional group and PVS groups.

نویسندگان

Shrishti Bhardwaj

Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Lalit Kumar

Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Shefali Singla

Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Charnpreet Singh

Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Kobayashi M, Srinivasan M, Ammann P, Perriard J, Ohkubo C, ...
  • Elawady D, Adam MA, Allam H, Mahmoud II, Alqutaibi AY, ...
  • Lambade D, Lambade P, Gundawar S. Implant supported mandibular overdenture: ...
  • Gaur N. An In Vitro Study to Evaluate Retention of ...
  • Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant ...
  • Gupta N, Bansal R, Shukla NK. The effect of ball ...
  • Uludag B, Polat S. Retention characteristics of different attachment systems ...
  • Emami E, de Souza RF, Bernier J, Rompré P, Feine ...
  • Al-Ghafli SA, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Kang K. The in ...
  • Rutkunas V, Mizutani H, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Wear simulation ...
  • Celebic A, Kovacic I, Petricevic N, Alhajj MN, Topic J, ...
  • Elmowafy DA, Emera RM, Hegazy SA. Two versus three implants ...
  • Shastry T, Anupama NM, Shetty S, Nalinakshamma M. An in ...
  • Wakam R, Ramalingam S, Mawussi KB, Gorin C, Benoit A. ...
  • Sharaf MY, Eskander A, Afify MA. Novel PEEK retentive elements ...
  • Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. In vitro study of ...
  • Choi J-W, Yun B-H, Jeong C-M, Huh J-B. Retentive properties ...
  • Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Maniewicz S, Müller F. Implant overdentures ...
  • Rutkunas V, Mizutani H, Takahashi H. Influence of attachment wear ...
  • Alsabeeha NHM, Payne AGT, Swain MV. Attachment systems for mandibular ...
  • Arora S, Mittal S. Comparative Evaluation of Alteration in Retention ...
  • Upinder S, Saluja B, Gupta G, Kaur B, Singh G. ...
  • Kang T-Y, Kim J-H, Kim K-M, Kwon J-S. In vitro ...
  • Schweyen R, Beuer F, Arnold C, Hey J. Retentive characteristics ...
  • Klampfer MD, Klampfer E, Manufaktur D. Silicone as a Matrix ...
  • Cune M, Burgers M, van Kampen F, de Putter C, ...
  • Khan S, Issar G, Bansal S, Jagadeesh HG, Tyagi S. ...
  • Yılmaz E, Gencel B, Geckili O, Sakar O. Comparison of ...
  • Scherer MD, McGlumphy EA, Seghi RR, Campagni WV. Comparison of ...
  • Lehmann KM, Amim FV. Studies on the retention forces on ...
  • Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK, Jr B. Prospective clinical ...
  • Petropoulos VC, Smith W. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture ...
  • Pigozzo MN, Mesquita MF, Henriques GEP, Vaz LG. The service ...
  • Passia N, Ghazal M, Kern M. Long-term retention behaviour of ...
  • Wolf K, Ludwig K, Hartfil H, Kern M. Analysis of ...
  • Oda K, Kanazawa M, Takeshita S, Minakuchi S. Influence of ...
  • Rostom DA, Sheta NM. Evaluation of the Retention of Two ...
  • Osman R, Aal M. Comparative Assessment of Retentive Characteristics of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع