Comparison of retention in polyvinyl siloxane matrix systems versus conventional metal housing with nylon inserts in ball-retained mandibular implant overdentures
سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 160
فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JDMT-14-1_002
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 اسفند 1403
چکیده مقاله:
Objective: This study compared the retentive performance of two polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) matrix systems (retention.sil ۴۰۰ and ۶۰۰) versus conventional metal housing with nylon inserts in ball-retained mandibular overdentures.Methods: Thirty ball-retained overdenture models were allocated into three groups based on the attachment system material (n=۱۰): Group ۱, conventional metal housing with nylon inserts; Group ۲, retention.sil ۴۰۰; and Group ۳, retention.sil ۶۰۰. A total of ۱۴۴۰ insertion-removal cycles, simulating one year of clinical use, were conducted at ۵۰ mm/sec using a universal testing machine. Retention forces were measured at baseline (۰ cycles) and after ۳۶۰, ۷۲۰, ۱۰۸۰, and ۱۴۴۰ cycles. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Tukey's test at a significance level of P<۰.۰۵.Results: The conventional group showed the highest retention at all cycles. There were statistically significant differences in retention between the conventional group and both PVS groups at all cycles (P<۰.۰۰۱), but no significant differences were found between the two PVS groups (P>۰.۰۵). Absolute retention loss was significantly greater in the conventional metal housing with nylon inserts than in the two PVS groups (P<۰.۰۰۱). No significant difference was found in relative retention loss among the groups (P=۰.۱۰۸).Conclusions: Conventional metal housing with nylon inserts provided superior mean retention compared to the retention.sil ۴۰۰ and retention.sil ۶۰۰ matrix systems at all cycles, with no significant difference between the two PVS materials. The relative retention loss, however, did not significantly differ between the conventional group and PVS groups.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Shrishti Bhardwaj
Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Lalit Kumar
Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Shefali Singla
Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Charnpreet Singh
Department of Prosthodontics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :