Comparison of the Views of Muṭahharī on Firah and Schleiermacher on Religious Experience
محل انتشار: مجله مطالعات اسلامی معاصر، دوره: 7، شماره: 1
سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 73
فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JCIS-7-1_010
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 دی 1403
چکیده مقاله:
The aim of the present paper is to perform a descriptive-analytic study of the relationship between views of Muṭahharī on "fitrah" and Schleiermacher on "religious experience". The meaning of "fitrah" is the insight and inclination towards God, which is established within human nature, and "religious experience" according to Schleiermacher, means feeling of absolute and all-inclusive dependence on a distinct source from Human. In this article, after defining and providing explanations about "fitrah" and "religious experience," the similarities and differences between these two concepts are discussed. One of the similarities is that both innate theology and the feeling of absolute dependence are understood by presential knowledge and heart, not by mind, and both have an internal and intrinsic origin. One difference between the two concepts is that Schleiermacher's theory was put forward after being disappointed with the effectiveness of rational explanations in proving the existence of God, and with the aim of saving and justifying religion and belief in God, whereas the theory of "fitrah" does not share this aim. It is concluded that the two theories are substantially similar and share the same purpose. It appears that many "religious experiences" occur during the manifestation of innate or fitrah-based knowledge.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Seyed Mohammad Reza Mousavifaraz
Department of Theoretical Foundations of Islam, Faculty of Islamic Thought and Knowledge, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Hamed Aleyamin
Department of History, Civilization and Islamic Revolution, Faculty of Islamic Thought and Knowledge, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :