Outcomes of Patients with Bennett Fracture Treated with Three Different Surgical Techniques: A Systematic Review
محل انتشار: مجله استخوان و جراحی عمومی، دوره: 13، شماره: 1
سال انتشار: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 161
فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_TABO-13-1_002
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 دی 1403
چکیده مقاله:
Objectives: Bennett's fracture, the most common intra-articular fracture occurring at the base of the thumb, accounts for less than ۱% of all hand fractures. It typically results from specific traumatic mechanisms, deforming forces, and ligamentous injuries. To compare the functional outcomes and sequelae in patients with Bennett's fracture treated surgically using: Open reduction and internal screw fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous fixation, arthroscopy-assisted reduction and screw fixation.Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies on Bennett's fracture dislocations in patients over ۱۸ years of age without additional injuries. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Scielo, Lilacs, Oneme, and Epistemonikos databases, with language restrictions in English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, and German, and no date restrictions. Primary outcome variables included measures of functionality and secondary outcomes such as pain, stiffness, and osteoarthritis.Results: A total of ۱۸ studies met the selection criteria, with most being retrospective (۹۴.۴۵%). Pain measures were reported in ۷۷.۷۸% of the studies, predominantly using the VAS (min=۰ and max=۲). All techniques seemed to achieve similar functional outcomes. The main difference was the pain registered at follow-up, mainly by patients treated with open reduction. Osteoarthritis appeared as a common consequence of these fractures, regardless of the treatment type -excluding arthroscopy-assisted reduction as there was not enough data.Conclusion: The three techniques had similar functional outcomes. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation appear to result in less pain; however, both closed reduction with percutaneous fixation and open reduction with internal screw fixation have similar rates of osteoarthritis at follow-up. Unfortunately, there is insufficient data to evaluate arthroscopy-assisted reduction with screw fixation, suggesting the need for rigorous follow-up in patients undergoing this surgical intervention. Level of evidence: III
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Eduardo Velásquez-Girón
Division of Hand Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia
Edna Buitrago-Quiñonez
Division of Hand Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia
Jorge Hernánez-Guevara
Division of Hand Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia
Álvaro Kafury
Division of Hand Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :