Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of two polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash techniques and digital impressions for single implants adjacent to tooth crown preparations

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 87

فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JDMT-13-4_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 دی 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Objective: This study compared the dimensional accuracy of two polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques with the digital impression method for single implants adjacent to tooth crown preparations.Methods: Impressions were taken from a dental arch containing a full-metal preparation on the first molar adjacent to a Straumann tissue-level implant at the second premolar site. A laboratory scanner generated a standard tessellation language (STL) file as the reference for comparisons. Three methods were tested, each performed ۱۰ times: (۱) one-step putty-wash technique, (۲) two-step putty-wash technique, and (۳) digital impressions. Dimensional accuracy was assessed by measuring overall die dimensions, die height, die width, and the tooth-implant distance, using Geomagic Wrap software. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance at P < ۰.۰۵.Results: No significant differences were found among the methods for the die height (P = ۰.۱۳۰), die width (P = ۰.۱۸۰), and tooth-implant distance (P = ۰.۴۸۶). However, the digital impression method showed significantly greater overall dimensional accuracy than the one-step putty-wash technique (P = ۰.۰۰۴). The two-step putty-wash method showed no significant difference with the one-step method or digital impressions concerning the overall die accuracy (P > ۰.۰۵).Conclusions: Digital impressions demonstrated significantly higher overall dimensional accuracy than the one-step putty-wash technique. Die height, die width, and tooth-implant distance were comparable across methods. Digital impressions are recommended for optimal accuracy when taking impressions from single implants adjacent to tooth crown preparations. The two-step putty-wash method offers a reliable alternative when digital tools are unavailable.

نویسندگان

Hamidreza Rajati Haghi

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Hossein Dashti

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Saeid Sabzevari

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Amineh Khoshbakhti

Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Alireza Dankoub

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing ...
  • Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (۱۰-year) dental implant ...
  • Buzayan MM, Yunus NB. Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit ...
  • Baig MR. Multi-unit implant impression accuracy: A review of the ...
  • Abduo J. Accuracy of casts produced from conventional and digital ...
  • Fathi A, Rismanchian M, Yazdekhasti A, Salamati M. Accuracy of ...
  • Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of ...
  • Awad EM, ElSheikh MM, El-Segai AAem. Effect of soft tissue ...
  • Ahmed S, Hawsah A, Rustom R, Alamri A, Althomairy S, ...
  • Fathi A, Rismanchian M, Yazdekhasti A, Salamati M. Accuracy of ...
  • Rehmann P, Wald A, Wostmann B. The reproduction of implants ...
  • Cicciù M, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C, Gambino D, Amantia EM, ...
  • Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N. CEREC: science, research, and clinical application. ...
  • Ma M, Li X, Zou L, He J, Zhao B. ...
  • Sanda M, Miyoshi K, Baba K. Trueness and precision of ...
  • Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of ...
  • Hafezeqoran A, Rahbar M, Koodaryan R, Molaei T. Comparing the ...
  • Gedrimiene A, Adaskevicius R, Rutkunas V. Accuracy of digital and ...
  • Dugal R, Railkar B, Musani S. Comparative evaluation of dimensional ...
  • Nissan J, Laufer B-Z, Brosh T, Assif D, Maurice T. ...
  • Nissan J, Rosner O, Bukhari MA, Ghelfan O, Pilo R. ...
  • Radfar S, Alikhasi M, Khorshidi S, Tohidkhah S, Morvaridi Farimani ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع