Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on “Conception” and “Assent”

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 37

فایل این مقاله در 24 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PFK-26-3_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 آذر 1403

چکیده مقاله:

According to the orthodox view in Aristotelian tradition concerning the division of knowledge (ʿilm), some knowledge in the form of conception (taṣawwur) and assent (taṣdīq) is attainable (al-ʿilm al-ḥuṣūlī). The attainable knowledge is divided into primitive and theoretical. Regarding primitive knowledge, concerning “the conception”, knowing the language and noticing the word is enough to understand it without asking anyone,and concerning “the assent”, the assertion of which its ingredients are already knownis primitive and hence non-acquisitive if the knower immediately and without any investigation finds its truth-value. On the other hand, acquisitive knowledge is the knowledge about which the above conditions are not enough and the thinker should make some effort to obtain it, hence it is theoretical. However, according to Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, a famous Muslim philosopher, logician, and theologian, all “concepts” and all “assents”, are non-acquisitive although they may be divided into primitive and theoretical. His view leads to the conclusion that all sciences are non-acquisitive, that is, mankind does not have the power to acquire them, which is a counterintuitive view. Ṭūsī is the most famous critic of Rāzī. In this paper, first, I have examined Rāzī’s views and arguments and Ṭūsī’s criticisms. Secondly, I have suggested that Rāzī’s view is rooted in his theological viewpoint, which is coherent with Ashʿarite doctrine.

نویسندگان

Seyyed Mohammad Ali Hodjati

Professor, Department of Philosophy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Adamson, P. & Benevich, F. (۲۰۲۳). Fakhr al-Din al-Razi. The ...
  • URL: https//plato.stanford.edu/archives/spring۲۰۲۳/entries/al-din-al-razi/Al-Rasyid, H. H. (۲۰۲۱). Al-Ashy’ariyyah; Theory of al-Kasb and ...
  • Al-Raza, F. D. (n. d.). Muḥaṣṣal afkar al-mutiqaddimin wa al-mutiʼakhirin ...
  • Al-Razi, F. D. (۲۰۰۲). Mantiq al-molakhkhaṣ. (A. Faramarz Qaramaleki & ...
  • Al-Razi, F. D. (n. d.). Al-Tafsir al-kabir (Mafatih al-ghayb) ...
  • https://lib.eshia.ir/۴۱۷۳۰/۲۴/۳۹۵Al-Tusi, N. D. (n. d.). Talkhiṣ al-muaassal, appendix in muhassal ...
  • Ceylan. Y. (۱۹۸۰). Theology and tafsir in the major works ...
  • Daghim, S. (۲۰۰۱). Mousuʿa-yi musṭalihat al-Imam Fakhr al-Din al-Razi. Maktabah ...
  • Erkmen, R. (۲۰۲۲). Fakhr al-Din al-Razi: the problem of knowledge ...
  • Ghadrdan-Gharamaleki, M. H., & Ghadrdan-Gharamaleki, A. (۲۰۱۶). Contemplation on the ...
  • Jacobsen, B. H. N. (۲۰۲۰). Meno’s Paradox and first principles ...
  • Khademi, A., & Talegani, S. H. (۲۰۱۳). Effect of philosophical ...
  • Khazaeli, M. B., Montazer, Q. A., & MirJafari, H. (۲۰۱۲). ...
  • Mullā Sadrā, (۱۹۹۹). Al-Tanqih fi al-mantiq. (G. Yasipur, Ed.). (A. ...
  • Plato. (۱۹۵۶). Protagoras and Meni. (W. K. C. Guthrie, Trans.). ...
  • Suarning (۲۰۲۳). The concept of Al-Kasb Theory in Islamic theology: ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع