Additive Ratio Assessment for Supplier Selection Using Compromise Weighting of Step Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis and The Method Based on Removal Effects of a Criteria: A Case Study in the Indonesian Leather Industry

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 85

فایل این مقاله در 18 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJIEPR-35-4_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 آذر 1403

چکیده مقاله:

This paper proposes a decision-support model for supplier selection based on integrating the step weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), the method based on the removal effects of a criterion (MEREC), and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) using a case study of the leather industry in Indonesia. The model starts by identifying the main criteria using the opinions of leather industry experts using Delphi. The second stage is to weigh them based on the main criteria, using compromising of objective and subjective weighting methods, namely MEREC and SWARA. The suppliers are selected and ranked based on the main criteria. Lastly, a sensitivity analysis will be performed to check the robustness. Delphi methodology adopted in this study gives managers in Indonesia's leather industries insights into the factors that must be considered when selecting suppliers for their organizations. The selected approach also aids them in prioritizing the criterion. Managers can utilize the supplier selection methodology suggested in this study to rank the suppliers based on various factors/criteria. This study makes three novel contributions to the supplier selection area. First, Delphi is applied to the Indonesian leather industry and integrates MEREC, SWARA, and ARAS into supplier selection. Second, sensitivity analysis allows the determination of the impact of modifications in the primary criteria on the ranking of suppliers and assists decision-makers in assessing the resilience of the process. Last, we find it essential to develop a simple methodology for managers of the Indonesian leather industry to select the best suppliers. Moreover, this method will help managers divide complex decision-making problems into more straightforward methodologies.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

agus ristono

University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • M. Ekhtiari, M. Zandieh, A. Alem-Tabriz, and M. Rabieh, “A ...
  • M. M. Paydar, A. Arabsheybani, and A. S. Safaei, “Sustainable ...
  • S. Bag, M. Sabbir Rahman, T. M. Choi, G. Srivastava, ...
  • M. Kabak and G. Oztek, “A Multi-Criteria Approach to Sustainable ...
  • S. Akbaş and T. Erbay Dalkiliç, “Multi-criteria supplier selection based ...
  • B. Israel, L. Mahuwi, and B. Mwenda, “A review of ...
  • S. R. Brady, “Utilizing and Adapting the Delphi Method for ...
  • K. L. K. Koskey et al., “Flip it: An exploratory ...
  • T. T. Hue and N. K. Oanh, “Antecedents of green ...
  • S. Drumm, C. Bradley, and F. Moriarty, “‘More of an ...
  • M. C. Laupichler, A. Aster, and T. Raupach, “Delphi study ...
  • D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, and E. K. Zavadskas, “A framework ...
  • V. Keršuliene, E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “Racionalaus ginču̧ ...
  • M. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and ...
  • R. Cheng, J. Fan, and F. Wui, “A dynamic multi-attribute ...
  • M. Moradian, V. Modanloo, and S. Aghaiee, “Comparative analysis of ...
  • H. Çalıskan, B. Kursuncu, C. Kurbanog˘lu, and S. Y. Güven, ...
  • J. Chu and Y. Su, “The Application of TOPSIS Method ...
  • E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and T. Vilutiene, “Multiple criteria ...
  • E. K. Zavadskas, P. Vainiūnas, Z. Turskis, and J. Tamošaitienė, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع