Functional Fit and the Instrumental Character of Knowledge: Rethinking the Theory of Knowledge with Radical Constructivism

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 110

فایل این مقاله در 14 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PHILO-18-48_012

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 شهریور 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Radical constructivism (RC), introduced by Ernst von Glasersfeld, is an instrumentalist theory of knowledge that challenges the notion of knowledge as a picture or representation of a real, external world. Instead, RC, by integrating ideas from different theoretical fields - such as cybernetics, evolutionary biology, and evolutionary psychology - considers the purpose of the cognitive organism to construct knowledge not to achieve truth, but to construct perceptual and conceptual structures that help to maintain adaptation and cognitive equilibrium. However, the basic question here is, by what character these structures can achieve the purpose. By examining Glasersfeld's writings, this paper argues that the character is a "functional fit", which is based on a fundamental shift in RC, i.e. the shift from "matching" to "fitness". From this point of view, the "fit knowledge" is not due to its match with the external reality, but due to its repeated success in solving a specific problem, it is viable, and by preventing unwanted changes or perturbations, it gives order to the experiential world of the organism and helps to maintain its cognitive equilibrium. This perspective has the potential to create transformation in various fields, from education to ethics and social issues. Therefore, this paper, while examining the basic concepts of radical constructivist epistemology, also deals with its theoretical and practical applications.

نویسندگان

Meysam Khanjanian Mian-Poshte

Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Bettoni, M. C., & Castellini, C. (۲۰۲۱). Interaction in Assistive ...
  • Burr, V. (۲۰۰۲). The Person in Social Psychology. Psychology Press ...
  • Burr, V. (۲۰۱۵). Social Constructionism (۳rd). Routledge ...
  • Epp, S., & et al. (۲۰۲۱). Radical transformation: Embracing constructivism ...
  • Galuszka, F. (۲۰۰۹). Towards a cybernetic-constructivist understanding of painting. Constructivist ...
  • Gash, H. (۲۰۱۴). Constructing constructivism. Constructivist Foundations ۹(۳), ۳۰۲–۳۱۰ ...
  • Gash, H. (۲۰۲۳). Integrating radical constructivism in social contexts. Constructivist ...
  • Gergen, K. J. (۲۰۰۹). Relational being: Beyond self and community. ...
  • Gergen, K. J. (۲۰۱۱a). The self as social construction. Psychological ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۱۹۸۳). On the concept of interpretation. Poetics, ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۱۹۸۶). Steps in the Construction Of “Others” ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۱۹۸۸). The reluctance to change a way ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۱۹۹۱a). Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۱۹۹۱b). Constructivism in Education. In The International ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۱۹۹۵b). A Constructivist Approach to Teaching. In ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۱۹۹۸). Why constructivism must be radical. In ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۲۰۰۰). Problems of Constructivism. In Radical Constructivism ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۲۰۰۱). The Radical Constructivist View of Science. ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۲۰۰۶). You have to be two to ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۲۰۰۷). Key Works in Radical Constructivism. Sense ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۲۰۰۸). Who conceives of society? Constructivist Foundations ...
  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (۲۰۱۰). Why people dislike radical constructivism. Constructivist ...
  • Goldstein, B. (۲۰۲۱). Materialism and selection bias: Political psychology from ...
  • Herr, C. M. (۲۰۱۹). Design Is Construction, Construction Is Design. ...
  • Kelly, G. A. (۱۹۵۵). The psychology of personal constructs. Vol. ...
  • Kenny, V. (۲۰۱۰). Exile on mainstream. Constructivism in psychotherapy and ...
  • Kharkevich, M. V. (۲۰۲۳). Grounding Ontology of the “International” in ...
  • Oblak A. (۲۰۲۲). Steps towards a constructivist psychiatry. Constructivist Foundations ...
  • Palmaru, R. (۲۰۱۶). Constructivism as a key towards further understanding ...
  • Quale, A. (۲۰۱۴). Ethics: A radical-constructivist approach. Constructivist Foundations, ۹(۲), ...
  • Quale, A. (۲۰۱۵). Religion: A radical-constructivist perspective. Constructivist Foundations, ۱۱(۱), ...
  • Raskin, J. D. (۲۰۰۲). Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, ...
  • Richards, L. D. (۲۰۰۷). Connecting radical constructivism to social transformation ...
  • Riegler, A. & Quale, A. (۲۰۱۰). Editorial: Can radical constructivism ...
  • Rusch, G. (۲۰۰۷). Understanding. The mutual regulation of cognition and ...
  • Scholl, A. (۲۰۱۰). Radical constructivism in communication science. Constructivist Foundations, ...
  • Scholl, A. (۲۰۱۶). The micro-macro-problem in constructivism. Constructivist Foundations, ۱۲(۱), ...
  • Troadec, B. (۲۰۰۷). Constructivism, culture, and cognitive development: What kind ...
  • Zahavi, D. (۲۰۲۲). Individuality and community: The limits of social ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع