Comparison of Stone Retrieval Basket, Stone Cone and Holmium Laser: Which One Is Better in Retropulsion and Stone-Free Status for Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi?
محل انتشار: مجله لیزر در علوم پزشکی، دوره: 10، شماره: 3
سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 62
فایل این مقاله در 6 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JLMS-10-3_005
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 مرداد 1403
چکیده مقاله:
Abstract Introduction: Transurethral lithotripsy (TUL) is an appropriate treatment for ureteral stones and is usually used for stones in the middle and lower part of the ureter. Different devices such as Holmium laser, stone basket and stone cone exist to prevent any fragments from retropulsion during TUL. The present study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the Holmium laser, stone basket and stone cone. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from September ۲۰۱۶ to January ۲۰۱۸ comparing various TUL methods in ۸۸ subjects with proximal ureteral calculi. The study participants were devided into four matched groups. The first one included ۲۰ patients undergoing TUL with no device (Group ۱), the second group included ۲۲ patients undergoing TUL while using the stone retrieval basket, the third group included ۱۸ patients undergoing TUL while utilizing the stone cone and the fourth group included ۲۸ patients undergoing TUL while using Hol-YAG laser. Results: A residual stone ≥ ۳ mm was recorded in ۱۵.۹% of the patients. stone free rate were seen in ۱۰۰%, ۹۰.۹, ۸۳.۳%and ۵۵% in Holmium laser group, retrieval basket group, stone cone group and no device group respectively(p:۰.۰۰۱). Lowest rate of surgery complications including ureteral perforation, Post-operative fever and mucosal damage between ۴ groups (p: ۰.۰۰۳) and highest time of surgery (p: ۰.۰۰۱) belong to laser group. If we want to ignore the laser group, success rate for lithotripsy was better in both groups with stone retrieval device compared to the no device group, but no advantage existed between stone basket and stone cone. Conclusion:We can safely conclude that laser significantly help to prevent stone migration during TUL. If we want to ignore the laser group, success rate for lithotripsy was significantly better in both groups with stone retrieval device compared to the no device group, but no advantage existed between stone basket and stone cone. Keywords: Stone cone Stone retrieval basket Transurethral lithotripsy Ureteral calculi Ureteral stone Lithoclast lithotripter Holmium-YAG Laser