How and Where Do We Ask Sensitive Questions: Self-reporting of STI-associated Symptoms Among the Iranian General Population

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 54

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-7-8_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مرداد 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Background Reliable population-based data on sexually transmitted infections (STI) are limited in Iran and selfreporting remains the main source of indirect estimation of STI-associated symptoms in the country. However, where and how the questions are asked could influence the rate of self-reporting. In the present study, we aimed to assess what questionnaire delivery method (ie, face-to-face interview [FTFI], self-administered questionnaire [SAQ], or audio self-administered questionnaire [Audio-SAQ]) and setting (ie, street, household or hair salon) leads to more reliable estimates for the prevalence of self-reported STI-associated symptoms.   Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in winter ۲۰۱۴ on a gender-balanced (۵۰.۰% men) sample of ۲۸۸ individuals aged ۱۸–۵۹ years old in Kerman, Iran. Respondents were recruited in (a) crowded public places and streets, (b) their households, and (c) hair salons. Data was collected on history of current and ۶-month (ie, past ۶ months) STI-associated symptoms. Three different methods including FTFI, SAQ and or Audio-SAQ were applied randomly in households and non randomly in streets and hair salons to collect data among the respondents. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to compare the settings and methods separately.   Results A total of ۲.۸% of men and ۹.۴% of women self-reported at least one STI-associated symptom. Respondents were significantly more likely to report STI-associated symptoms when completing questionnaires on the street compared to their household (P = .۰۰۰۱). While women were less likely to report symptoms in FTFI compared to SAQ (P = .۰۳۶), no significant differences were found between men’s responses across different methods (P = .۰۶۴).   Conclusion Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of different combinations of methods and settings to find the optimal way to collect data on STI-associated symptoms.

نویسندگان

Maryam Nasirian

Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Health School; and Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Samira Hosseini Hooshyar

HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Ali Akbar Haghdoost

Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Mohammad Karamouzian

HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Haghdoost AA, Baneshi MR, Eybpoosh S, Khajehkazemi R. Comparison of ...
  • Tan MT, Tang ML, Tian GL, Yuen KC. Bayesian non-randomized ...
  • Nasirian M, Baneshi MR, Kamali K, Haghdoost AA. Population-based survey ...
  • Griesler PC, Kandel DB, Schaffran C, Hu MC, Davies M. ...
  • Langhaug LF, Sherr L, Cowan FM. How to improve the ...
  • Roberts C. Mixing modes of data collection in surveys: A ...
  • Langhaug LF, Cheung YB, Pascoe S, Hayes R, Cowan FM. ...
  • Phillips AE, Gomez GB, Boily MC, Garnett GP. A systematic ...
  • Gregson S, Zhuwau T, Ndlovu J, Nyamukapa CA. Methods to ...
  • Langhaug LF. How you ask the question really matters: A ...
  • Lessler JT, O'Reilly JM. Mode of interview and reporting of ...
  • Kuder GF, Richardson MW. The theory of the estimation of ...
  • Nasirian M, Karamouzian M, Kamali K, et al. Care Seeking ...
  • Division UNS. Designing household survey samples: practical guidelines. United Nations ...
  • Höglinger M, Jann B, Diekmann A. Sensitive questions in online ...
  • Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD, Forrester JE. Statistical Analysis ...
  • Naher AF, Krumpal I. Asking sensitive questions: the impact of ...
  • Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: ...
  • Tourangeau R, Smith TW. Asking sensitive questions: The impact of ...
  • Kataoka Y, Yaju Y, Eto H, Horiuchi S. Self-administered questionnaire ...
  • McNeeley S. Sensitive Issues in Surveys: Reducing Refusals While Increasing ...
  • Boekeloo BO, Schiavo L, Rabin DL, Conlon RT, Jordan CS, ...
  • Langhaug LF, Cheung YB, Pascoe SJ, et al. How you ...
  • Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: A “how to” guide. Research Triangle ...
  • Brenner M. Development of a factorial survey to explore restricting ...
  • Aviram H. What Would You Do? Conducting Web-Based Factorial Vignette ...
  • Liebig S, Sauer C, Friedhoff S. Using Factorial Surveys to ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع