Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 61

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-7-7_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مرداد 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Background Epidemiological evidence on the social determinants of health inequity is well-advanced, but considerably less attention has been given to evaluating the impact of public policies addressing those social determinants. Methodological challenges to produce evidence on policy outcomes present a significant barrier to mobilising policy actions for health equities. This review aims to examine methodological approaches to policy evaluation of health equity outcomes and identify promising approaches for future research.   Methods We conducted a systematic narrative review of literature critically evaluating policy impact on health equity, synthesizing information on the methodological approaches used. We searched and screened records from five electronic databases, using pre-defined protocols resulting in a total of ۵۰ studies included for review. We coded the studies according to (۱) type of policy analysed; (۲) research design; (۳) analytical techniques; (۴) health outcomes; and (۵) equity dimensions evaluated.   Results We found a growing number of a wide range of policies being evaluated for health equity outcomes using a variety of research designs. The majority of studies employed an observational research design, most of which were cross-sectional, however, other approaches included experimental designs, simulation modelling, and meta-analysis. Regression techniques dominated the analytical approaches, although a number of novel techniques were used which may offer advantages over traditional regression analysis for the study of distributional impacts of policy. Few studies made intra-national or cross-national comparisons or collected primary data. Despite longstanding challenges of attribution in policy outcome evaluation, the majority of the studies attributed change in physical or mental health outcomes to the policy being evaluated.   Conclusion Our review provides an overview of methodological approaches to health equity policy outcome evaluation, demonstrating what is most commonplace and opportunities from novel approaches. We found the number of studies evaluating the impacts of public policies on health equity are on the rise, but this area of policy evaluation still requires more attention given growing inequities

کلیدواژه ها:

Policy Evaluation ، Methodology ، Health Inequities ، Social Determinants of Health ، Review

نویسندگان

Janice Lee

School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Ashley Schram

School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Emily Riley

Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Patrick Harris

Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Fran Baum

Southgate Institute of Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Matt Fisher

Southgate Institute of Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Toby Freeman

Southgate Institute of Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Sharon Friel

School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, et al. WHO European ...
  • Marmot M, Commission on Social Determinants of H. Achieving health ...
  • Baum F, Friel S. Politics, policies and processes: a multidisciplinary ...
  • March JG, Olsen JP. The New Institutionalism - Organizational-Factors in ...
  • Nilsen PS, Christian, Roback K, Cairney P. Never the twain ...
  • Hudson JR, Lowe SG. Understanding the Policy Process: Analysing Welfare ...
  • Haas PJ, Springer JF. Applied Policy Research: Concepts and Cases. ...
  • Blas E, Gilson L, Kelly MP, et al. Addressing social ...
  • Leeuw F, Vaessen J. Impact evaluations and development: NONIE guidance ...
  • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, ...
  • Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or complex ...
  • Lynch J. Reframing inequality? The health inequalities turn as a ...
  • Kelly MP, Morgan A, Bonnefoy J, Butt J, Bergman V. ...
  • Milton B, Moonan M, Taylor-Robinson D, Whitehead M. How can ...
  • Commission on Social Determinants of Health WHO. Closing the gap ...
  • Banks G. Evidence-based policy making: what is it? How do ...
  • Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews ...
  • Collins JA, Fauser BC. Balancing the strengths of systematic and ...
  • Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and ...
  • Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on ...
  • Birkland TA. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts ...
  • Cochran CL, Malone EF. Public Policy: Perspectives and choices. ۵th ...
  • Peters BG. American Public Policy: Promise and Performance. ۹th ed. ...
  • Carson NA, ZahidHart W. Priority setting in public health and ...
  • World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and ...
  • Basu S, Vellakkal S, Agrawal S, Stuckler D, Popkin B, ...
  • Blakely T, Cobiac LJ, Cleghorn CL, et al. Health, Health ...
  • Barr B, Bambra C, Whitehead M. The impact of NHS ...
  • Stuckler D, Basu S, McKee M. Health care capacity and ...
  • Kloek GC, van Lenthe FJ, van Nierop PWM, Koelen MA, ...
  • Burstrom B, Whitehead M, Clayton S, Fritzell S, Vannoni F, ...
  • Hatzenbuehler ML, Keyes KM. Inclusive Anti-bullying Policies and Reduced Risk ...
  • Palència L, Malmusi D, De Moortel D, et al. The ...
  • Funnell SC, Rogers PJ. Purposeful program theory: effective use of ...
  • Bonner L. Using theory-based evaluation to build evidence-based health and ...
  • Weiss CH. Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based ...
  • Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Los Angeles: Sage Publications ...
  • Edwards P, Steinbach R, Green J, et al. Health impacts ...
  • Edwards R, Thomson G, Wilson N, et al. After the ...
  • McNamara C. Trade liberalization, social policies and health: an empirical ...
  • Reeves A, Karanikolos M, Mackenbach J, McKee M, Stuckler D. ...
  • Dalton AM, Jones A, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, White M, ...
  • Van de Gaer D, Vandenbossche J, Figueroa JL. Children's Health ...
  • Ogilvie D, Fayter D, Petticrew M, et al. The harvest ...
  • European Social Survey. The European Social Survery. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/. Accessed November ...
  • Mackenbach JP, McKee M. Government, politics and health policy: a ...
  • Kunst AE, Bos V, Mackenbach JP. Monitoring socio-economic inequalities in ...
  • White H. A contribution to current debates in impact evaluation. ...
  • Council MR. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs ...
  • Hu Y, van Lenthe FJ, Hoffmann R, van Hedel K, ...
  • Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, et al. Using natural ...
  • Milligan V, Phibbs P, Gurran N, Fagan K. Approaches to ...
  • Kunst AE. Evaluation of health equity impact of structural policies: ...
  • Exworthy M, Hunter DJ. The challenge of joined-up government in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع