The Need for a Dynamic Approach to Health System-Centered Innovations; Comment on “What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address? Insights From an International Scoping Review”

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 32

متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-8-7_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مرداد 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Lehoux and colleagues plea for a health systems perspective to evaluate innovations. Since many innovations and their scale-up strategies emerge from processes that are not (centrally) steered, we plea for any assessment with a dynamic, instead of a sequential, approach. We provide further guidance on how to adopt such dynamic approach, in order to better un-derstand and steer innovations for better health systems. A systems-level challenge is constituted by interactions and feedback loops between different actors and components of the health system. It is therefore essential to explore both the entry-point of innovation and the interactions with other components. If innovation is regarded as an injection of resources and opportunities into a health system, this system needs to have the capacity to transform these into desired outputs, the ‘absorption capacity.’ The highly organic diffusion of innovation in complex adapative systems cannot be easily controlled, but the system behaviours can be analysed, with occurance of phenomena such as path dependence, feedback loops, scale-free networks, emergent behaviour and phase transitions. This helps to anticipate unintended consequences, and to engage key actors in ongoing problem-solving and adaptation. By adopting a prospective approach, responsible innovation could set in motion prospective policy evaluations, which on the basis of iterative learning would allow decisionmakers to continuously adapt their policies and programmes. Priority-setting for innovation is an essentially political process that is geared towards consensus-building and grounded in values.

نویسندگان

Josefien van Olmen

Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

Bruno Marchal

Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

Button Ricarte

Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

Wim Van Damme

Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

Sara Van Belle

Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. ۱۹۶۶. Milbank ...
  • van Olmen J, Criel B, Bhojani U, et al. The ...
  • Lehoux P, Roncarolo F, Silva HP, Boivin A, Denis J-L, ...
  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. ...
  • de Savigny D, Blanchet K, Adam T. Applied systems thinking ...
  • van Olmen J, Criel B, Van Damme W, et al. ...
  • Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi ...
  • Potter C, Brough R. Systemic capacity building: a hierarchy of ...
  • Paina L, Peters DH. Understanding pathways for scaling up health ...
  • Pacifico Silva H, Lehoux P, Miller FA, Denis JL. Introducing ...
  • Cairney P. Complexity theory in political science and public policy. ...
  • Geyer R, Rahani S. Complexity and Public Policy. Complexity and ...
  • Edelenbos J, van Meerkerk I, van Leeuwen C. Vitality of ...
  • Klijn EH, Koppenjan JFM. Complexity in governance network theory. Complexity, ...
  • Room G. Complexity, institutions and public policy: Agile decision-making in ...
  • Pierre J, Peters BG. Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. ...
  • Pelletier D, Gervais S, Hafeez-Ur-Rehman H, Sanou D, Tumwine J. ...
  • Van Lerberghe W, Mechbal A, Kronfol N. The Collaborative Governance ...
  • Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ. ۲۰۰۰;۳۲۱(۷۲۷۲):۱۳۰۰-۱۳۰۱ ...
  • Daniels N, Sabin JE. Setting limits fairly: can we learn ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع