The comparison of different coronal restorations of endodontically treated posterior teeth on the patients' quality of life and satisfaction
سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 86
فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JOHOE-10-4_003
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مرداد 1403
چکیده مقاله:
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Everyday lives of individuals can be affected by dental treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of coronal restorations of endodontically treated posterior teeth (ETPT) on the patient's satisfaction and quality of life (QoL).METHODS: This cross-sectional clinical study was conducted at School of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey, using the semantic differential scale, Oral Health Impact Profile-۱۴ (OHIP-۱۴), and clinical assessments. Electronic charts and files of patients who received endodontic treatment and coronal restoration from June ۲۰۱۸ to January ۲۰۱۹ were reviewed. The patients included in the study had been treated by the same endodontist and restorative dental specialist. The coronal restoration of the ETPT had to be either direct composite restoration (DCR) or indirect ceramic restoration (ICR). ۱۲۳ patients were deemed fit for this study. A rendezvous was created for the patients who agreed to participate in the study (n = ۱۱۵) and those who came to the appointment were checked for the inclusion criteria. After clinical examinations, ۶۸ patients filled in the questionnaires. Demographic information, the semantic differential scale, and the OHIP-۱۴ scores-provided data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test, independent samples t-test, and the chi-square test. Statistical significance level was considered at P < ۰.۰۵.RESULTS: ۶۸ patients (n = ۳۴ in each group) participated in the study. DCR and ICR groups had similar mean OHIP-۱۴ scores (۵.۰۳ ± ۳.۳۶ and ۵.۱۵ ± ۶.۱۷, respectively) and general satisfaction scores (۹.۷۶ ± ۰.۴۳ and ۹.۸۸ ± ۰.۳۳, respectively) (P > ۰.۰۵). There was no statistically significant difference between the satisfaction values of the two groups regarding cost, time involved, pain, aesthetics, chewing ability, pleasantness, and general satisfaction (P > ۰.۰۵).CONCLUSION: According to the results of the present study, both treatment options have created similar satisfaction for patients and offered high QoL.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Ayfer Atav Ates
Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey
Melek Cam
Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey
Hasmet Ulukapi
Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :