The comparison of different coronal restorations of endodontically treated posterior teeth on the patients' quality of life and satisfaction

سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 86

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JOHOE-10-4_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مرداد 1403

چکیده مقاله:

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Everyday lives of individuals can be affected by dental treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of coronal restorations of endodontically treated posterior teeth (ETPT) on the patient's satisfaction and quality of life (QoL).METHODS: This cross-sectional clinical study was conducted at School of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey, using the semantic differential scale, Oral Health Impact Profile-۱۴ (OHIP-۱۴), and clinical assessments. Electronic charts and files of patients who received endodontic treatment and coronal restoration from June ۲۰۱۸ to January ۲۰۱۹ were reviewed. The patients included in the study had been treated by the same endodontist and restorative dental specialist. The coronal restoration of the ETPT had to be either direct composite restoration (DCR) or indirect ceramic restoration (ICR). ۱۲۳ patients were deemed fit for this study. A rendezvous was created for the patients who agreed to participate in the study (n = ۱۱۵) and those who came to the appointment were checked for the inclusion criteria. After clinical examinations, ۶۸ patients filled in the questionnaires. Demographic information, the semantic differential scale, and the OHIP-۱۴ scores-provided data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test, independent samples t-test, and the chi-square test. Statistical significance level was considered at P < ۰.۰۵.RESULTS: ۶۸ patients (n = ۳۴ in each group) participated in the study. DCR and ICR groups had similar mean OHIP-۱۴ scores (۵.۰۳ ± ۳.۳۶ and ۵.۱۵ ± ۶.۱۷, respectively) and general satisfaction scores (۹.۷۶ ± ۰.۴۳ and ۹.۸۸ ± ۰.۳۳, respectively) (P > ۰.۰۵). There was no statistically significant difference between the satisfaction values of the two groups regarding cost, time involved, pain, aesthetics, chewing ability, pleasantness, and general satisfaction (P > ۰.۰۵).CONCLUSION: According to the results of the present study, both treatment options have created similar satisfaction for patients and offered high QoL.

نویسندگان

Ayfer Atav Ates

Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey

Melek Cam

Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey

Hasmet Ulukapi

Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Siqueira JF, Rocas IN, Alves FR, Campos LC. Periradicular status ...
  • Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: contemporary ...
  • Dammaschke T, Nykiel K, Sagheri D, Schafer E. Influence of ...
  • Kopperud SE, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I. ...
  • Han SH, Sadr A, Tagami J, Park SH. Internal adaptation ...
  • Vohra F, Baloch H, Ab Ghani SM. Modern adhesive ceramic ...
  • Desai PD, Das UK. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth ...
  • Collares K, Correa MB, Laske M, Kramer E, Reiss B, ...
  • Torres CRG, Mailart MC, Crastechini E, Feitosa FA, Esteves SRM, ...
  • Shor A, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Fatigue load ...
  • Gokturk H, Karaarslan ES, Tekin E, Hologlu B, Sarikaya I. ...
  • McGrath C, Bedi R. Population based norming of the UK ...
  • Pesaressi E, Villena RS, Frencken JE. Dental caries and oral ...
  • Sterenborg BAMM, Bronkhorst EM, Wetselaar P, Lobbezoo F, Loomans BAC, ...
  • Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral ...
  • Hamasha AA, Hatiwsh A. Quality of life and satisfaction of ...
  • Kassis C, Khoury P, Mehanna CZ, Baba NZ, Bou Chebel ...
  • Liu P, McGrath C, Cheung GS. Improvement in oral health-related ...
  • Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM. The periapical index: A ...
  • Su N, van Wijk A, Visscher CM. Psychosocial oral health-related ...
  • Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health ...
  • Mumcu G, Inanc N, Ergun T, Ikiz K, Gunes M, ...
  • Allen PF. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. ...
  • Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The Measurement of Meaning. ...
  • Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations ...
  • Varlan C, Dimitriu B, Varlan V, Bodnar D, Suciu I. ...
  • Cimilli H, Karacayli U, +Pi+man N, Kartal N, Mumcu G. ...
  • Dugas NN, Lawrence HP, Teplitsky P, Friedman S. Quality of ...
  • Sischo L, Broder HL. Oral health-related quality of life: What, ...
  • Rocca GT, Krejci I. Bonded indirect restorations for posterior teeth: ...
  • Yamanel K, Caglar A, Gulsahi K, Ozden UA. Effects of ...
  • Murgueitio R, Bernal G. Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth ...
  • Abduo J, Sambrook RJ. Longevity of ceramic onlays: A systematic ...
  • Batalha-Silva S, de Andrada MA, Maia HP, Magne P. Fatigue ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع