Explaining Variations in Long-term Care Use and Expenditures Under the Public Long-term Care Insurance Systems: A Case Study Comparison of Korea and Japan

سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 47

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-12-0_038

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مرداد 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Background  Establishing universal coverage of formal long-term care (LTC) services is an urgent policy need for aging populations that requires efficient management of quality and financing. Although current variation in LTC service use between and within countries suggests the potential for improvement by efficient management, this topic remains underexamined. We aimed to identify the sources of variance in LTC use and expenditures through a unique crosscountry comparison of Japan and South Korea, which have formal public LTC insurance (LTCI) schemes that are analogous but have unique operational and demographic structures. Methods  Taking administrative regions as the unit of analysis, we assembled data on the LTC utilization rate of people aged ≥۶۵ years, and expenditures per recipient from ۲۰۱۳ to ۲۰۱۵ as the outcome variables. Explanatory variables included demand-related factors, such as regional demographic and economic conditions, and supply characteristics derived from existing public databases. We conducted weighted least squares regression with fixed effects for the pooled data and used Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition to identify sources of outcome variance between the two countries. Results  The average LTC utilization rate was ۶.۸% in Korea and ۱۸.۲% in Japan. Expenditures per recipient were approximately ۱.۴ times higher in Japan than in Korea. The difference in the utilization rate was mostly explained by between-country differences in supply- and demand-related factors, whereas the difference in expenditures per recipient was largely attributed to unobserved country-specific factors. Conclusion  The current findings suggest that LTC utilization is determined largely by the demographic and functional characteristics of older people, whereas expenditures are more likely affected by institutional factors such as the insurance governance scheme and the policy choice of the target population segment and coverage. The results suggest that strategic choice of LTC institutional schemes is required to ensure financial sustainability to meet changing demands caused by population aging.

نویسندگان

Hongsoo Kim

Graduate School of Public Health Department of Public Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Environment & Institute of Aging, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Nan-He Yoon

Division of Social Welfare and Health Administration, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea

Youjin Hahn

School of Economics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Hideki Hashimoto

Department of Health and Social Behavior, The University of Tokyo School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • OECD. Health at a Glance ۲۰۱۹. Paris: OECD Publishing; ۲۰۱۹. ...
  • Campbell JC, Ikegami N, Kwon S. Policy learning and cross-national ...
  • van Noort O, Schotanus F, van de Klundert J, Telgen ...
  • Karmann A, Sugawara S. Comparison of the Japanese and German ...
  • Bakx P, de Meijer C, Schut F, van Doorslaer E. ...
  • Alders P, Costa-Font J, de Klerk M, Frank R. What ...
  • Yan Z, Song C. Gender role attitudes and values toward ...
  • Kim H, Jeon B, Doetter LF, Tamiya N, Hashimoto H. ...
  • Kim H, Kwon S. A decade of public long-term care ...
  • Tamiya N, Noguchi H, Nishi A. Population ageing and wellbeing: ...
  • Gori C, Barbabella F, Campbell J, et al. How different ...
  • Gori C. Long-term care financing: inserting politics and resource allocation ...
  • Ikegami N. Key issues in designing long-term care systems: a ...
  • OECD. OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance ۲۰۲۰. Paris: ...
  • Korea National Health Insurance Service. ۲۰۱۹ Long-term Care Insurance Statistical ...
  • Korea National Health Insurance Service, Health Insurance Review and Assessment ...
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Statistics of Long-term ...
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Survey of Medical ...
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Statistics of Physicians, ...
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. Local Finance Statistics ...
  • Power Purchasing Parities (PPP). OECD Data Website. https://data.oecd.org/conversion/purchasing-power-parities-ppp.htm. Accessed April ...
  • Gordon EH, Peel NM, Samanta M, Theou O, Howlett SE, ...
  • Oaxaca R. Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int ...
  • Blinder AS. Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J ...
  • Eling M. Financing long-term care: some ideas from Switzerland: comment ...
  • Nadash P. The evolution of long-term care programs: comment on ...
  • Costa-Font J, Turati G. Regional healthcare decentralization in unitary states: ...
  • Geyer J. Notes about comparing long-term care expenditures across countries: ...
  • Gianino MM, Lenzi J, Martorana M. Trajectories of long-term care ...
  • OECD. Demographic trends. In: Health at a Glance ۲۰۱۷: OECD ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع