Public Heterogeneous Preferences for Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Service Delivery in Western China: A Discrete Choice Experiment

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 250

فایل این مقاله در 11 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-13-1_046

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مرداد 1403

چکیده مقاله:

Background  Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is an efficient method that can reduce lung cancer mortality in high-risk individuals. However, few studies have attempted to measure the preferences for LDCT LCS service delivery. This study aimed to generate quantitative information on the Chinese population’s preferences for LDCT LCS service delivery. Methods  The general population aged ۴۰ to ۷۴ in the Sichuan province of China was invited to complete an online discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE required participants to answer ۱۴ discrete choice questions comprising five attributes: facility levels, facility ownership, travel mode, travel time, and out-of-pocket cost. Choice data were analyzed using mixed logit and latent class logit models.  Results  The study included ۲,۵۲۹ respondents, with ۷۴۶ (۲۹.۵%) identified as being at risk for lung cancer. Mixed logit model analysis revealed that all five attributes significantly influenced respondents’ choices. Facility levels had the highest relative importance (۴۴.۴%), followed by facility ownership (۲۸.۱%), while out-of-pocket cost had the lowest importance (۶.۴%). The atrisk group placed relatively more importance on price and facility ownership compared to the nonrisk group. Latent class logit model identified five distinct classes with varying preferences.  Conclusion  This study revealed significant heterogeneity in preferences for lung cancer screening service attributes among the Chinese population, with facility level and facility ownership being the most important factors. The findings underscore the need for tailored strategies targeting different subgroup preferences to increase screening participation rates and improve early detection outcomes.

نویسندگان

Wenjuan Tao

Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Ting Bao

Health Management Center, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Tao Gu

Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Jay Pan

HEOA Group, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Weimin Li

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Ruicen Li

Health Management Center, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer ...
  • Han B, Zheng R, Zeng H, et al. Cancer incidence ...
  • Zeng H, Ran X, An L, et al. Disparities in ...
  • Zeng H, Zheng R, Guo Y, et al. Cancer survival ...
  • Poon C, Haderi A, Roediger A, Yuan M. Should we ...
  • Bonney A, Malouf R, Marchal C, et al. Impact of ...
  • Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM, et al. Screening for ...
  • Dai M, Shi JF, Li N. Cancer screening program in ...
  • Chen W, Li N, Cao MM, Ren JS, Shi JF, ...
  • Wen Y, Yu LZ, Du LB, et al. [Analysis of ...
  • Norman R, Moorin R, Maxwell S, Robinson S, Brims F. ...
  • Zhao Z, Du L, Wang L, Wang Y, Yang Y, ...
  • Jia Q, Chen H, Chen X, Tang Q. Barriers to ...
  • Wang GX, Baggett TP, Pandharipande PV, et al. Barriers to ...
  • Mansfield C, Tangka FK, Ekwueme DU, et al. Stated preference ...
  • Vass C, Boeri M, Karim S, et al. Accounting for ...
  • Goossens LM, Utens CM, Smeenk FW, Donkers B, van Schayck ...
  • Sever I, Verbič M, Sever EK. Valuing the delivery of ...
  • Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis ...
  • Hall R, Medina-Lara A, Hamilton W, Spencer AE. Attributes used ...
  • Mandrik O, Yaumenenka A, Herrero R, Jonker MF. Population preferences ...
  • Ries PW. Physician Contacts by Sociodemographic and Health Characteristics, United ...
  • Szinay D, Cameron R, Naughton F, Whitty JA, Brown J, ...
  • He J, Li N, Chen WQ, et al. [China guideline ...
  • de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample ...
  • Chen B, Li W, Jia Y, et al. [A cross-sectional ...
  • Pan J, Wang J, Tao W, et al. Is low-dose ...
  • Reed SD, Yang JC, Gonzalez JM, Johnson FR. Quantifying value ...
  • Ammi M, Peyron C. Heterogeneity in general practitioners' preferences for ...
  • Ostermann J, Mühlbacher A, Brown DS, et al. Heterogeneous patient ...
  • Hauber AB, González JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, et al. Statistical methods ...
  • Pacifico D, Yoo HI. lclogit: a Stata command for fitting ...
  • Zimmerman SM. Factors influencing Hispanic participation in prostate cancer screening. ...
  • Li Y, Gong W, Kong X, Mueller O, Lu G. ...
  • Dong E, Liu S, Chen M, et al. Differences in ...
  • Tang C, Xu J, Zhang M. The choice and preference ...
  • Kim ES, Moored KD, Giasson HL, Smith J. Satisfaction with ...
  • Anderson C, Seff LR, Batra A, Bhatt C, Palmer RC. ...
  • Tao W, Yu X, Shao J, Li R, Li W. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع