Layers of protection analysis to achieve safety integrity level (SIL), Case study: Hydrogen unit of refinery

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 122

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJPAS-5-11_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 اسفند 1402

چکیده مقاله:

To identify and evaluate hazard in process industries as oil and gas, there are various methods in which hazard and operability study (HAZOP) and layers of protection analysis (LOPA) are the most common methods. The present study aims to analyze layers of protection to achieve safety integrity level in hydrogen unit of refinery. After performing library studies and data collection of events in refinery, hazards of hydrogen unit as operating nodes and deviations with causes and consequences are identified using HAZOP method. The next stage is presenting corrective solutions by LOPA method and target factor. Then, frequencies are determined for the initiating event by the experts. By completing the sheets of each event, independent layers of protection and integrity level are determined. The results of evaluation of identified risks showed that ۱۱ cases had risk higher than ۱۵ and it is not acceptable. The analysis of consequence of hazards showed that for ۶ hazardous points, independent layers of protection can reduce risk as ۱۰۰% to target factor (۱۰-۵) and safety integrity level is fulfilled. Regarding the eighths scenario “elimination of repulsive system of equipment and lines with the high temperature of very hot steam”, layers of protection cannot increase safety integrity level to more than ۶۰% (۱۰-۳) and to provide safety to target factor, after eliminating the identified problems, other layers are positioned. In this study, to achieve safety integrity level in hydrogen unit of refiner. A three period plan (short-term, mid-term and long-term) is proposed.To identify and evaluate hazard in process industries as oil and gas, there are various methods in which hazard and operability study (HAZOP) and layers of protection analysis (LOPA) are the most common methods. The present study aims to analyze layers of protection to achieve safety integrity level in hydrogen unit of refinery. After performing library studies and data collection of events in refinery, hazards of hydrogen unit as operating nodes and deviations with causes and consequences are identified using HAZOP method. The next stage is presenting corrective solutions by LOPA method and target factor. Then, frequencies are determined for the initiating event by the experts. By completing the sheets of each event, independent layers of protection and integrity level are determined. The results of evaluation of identified risks showed that ۱۱ cases had risk higher than ۱۵ and it is not acceptable. The analysis of consequence of hazards showed that for ۶ hazardous points, independent layers of protection can reduce risk as ۱۰۰% to target factor (۱۰-۵) and safety integrity level is fulfilled. Regarding the eighths scenario “elimination of repulsive system of equipment and lines with the high temperature of very hot steam”, layers of protection cannot increase safety integrity level to more than ۶۰% (۱۰-۳) and to provide safety to target factor, after eliminating the identified problems, other layers are positioned. In this study, to achieve safety integrity level in hydrogen unit of refiner. A three period plan (short-term, mid-term and long-term) is proposed.

کلیدواژه ها:

Risk assessment ، Hazard and operability study (HAZOP) ، Layers of protection analysis (LOPA) ، Safety integrity level (SIL) ، Hydrogen unit of refinery

نویسندگان

Akram Delavar

Department of Environment Management, Faculty Marine Science and Technology, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Mahnaz Mirza Ebrahim Tehrani

Department of Environment Management, Faculty Marine Science and Technology, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Seyed Shamseddin Alizadeh

Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Alizadeh, S.S., Moshashaei, P., 2015. The Bowtie method in safety ...
  • Alizadeh, S.S., Sheikh Damanab, P., Rasoulzadeh, Y., Moshashaie, P., Varmazyar, ...
  • Berg, A.R., 2007. Applicability of layer of protection analysis to ...
  • Bridges, W., Dowell, III.A., Gollin, M., Greenfield, W., Poulsen, J., ...
  • Cameron, I.T., Raman, R., 2005. Process systems risk management Elsevier. ...
  • Carrillo-Castrillo, J.A., Rubio-Romero, J.C., Guadix, J., Onieva, L., 2015. Risk ...
  • Chongguang, W., Zhang Beike, M.X., 2007. The Layers of Protection ...
  • Craddock, H., 1997. Safety hand in hand with quality. Quality ...
  • Dunjó, J., Fthenakis, V., Vílchez, J.A., Arnaldos, J., 2010. Hazard ...
  • Freeman, R., 2007. Using layer of protection analysis to define ...
  • Guo, H-t., Yang, X-h., 2006. Safety integrity level of safety ...
  • Habibi, E., Zare, S., Keshavarzi, M., Mousavi, M., Yousefi, H.A., ...
  • Hasheminejad, N., Halvani, G.H., Moghadasi, M., Zolali, F., Shafizade Bafghi, ...
  • Isimite, J., Rubini, P.A., 2016. Dynamic HAZOP case study using ...
  • Jafari, M., Lajevardi, S., Mohammad-Fam, I., 2015. Semi quantitative risk ...
  • Jarvis, J., 1997. Occupational health and safety: Take the first ...
  • Kjellén, U., 2000. Prevention of accidents through experience feedback. CRC ...
  • Lees, F., Loss, 2012. Loss prevention in the process industries: ...
  • MARSH., 2002. The 200 Largest Losses 2921-1002: Large property damage ...
  • Mearns, K., Whitaker, S.M., Flin, R., 2001. Benchmarking safety climate ...
  • Millner, N., Small, T., 2006. Deakin Crick R. Learning by ...
  • Nassir, P., Alizadeh, S.S., Golbabaei, F., Shahtaheri, S.J.A.D., 2007. Hazards ...
  • Ouazraoui, N., Nait-Said, R., Bourareche, M., Sellami, I., 2013. Layers ...
  • Rasoulzadeh, Y., Alizadeh, S.S., Valizadeh, S., 2015. Health, safety and ...
  • Rausand, M., 2013. Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications. John ...
  • Summers, A.E., 2003. Introduction to layers of protection analysis. J. ...
  • Wei, C., Rogers, W.J., Mannan, M.S., 2008. Layer of protection ...
  • Yi, K.H., Lee, S.S., 2016. A policy intervention study to ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع