Perceptions of sign language among teachers in schools that enroll deaf children in Bulawayo (Zimbabwe)

سال انتشار: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 106

فایل این مقاله در 16 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJPAS-5-5_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 اسفند 1402

چکیده مقاله:

The study set out to establish and analyse how teachers in schools that enroll deaf children in Bulawayo (Zimbabwe) perceived Sign language. A sample of ۳۰ specialist and ۳۰ mainstream teachers participated in the study which utilized descriptive and comparative survey designs. A Self-Designed Sign Language Perception Thematic Scale was used for data collection. The data were summarized into tables and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results indicated that teachers in schools that enroll deaf children in Bulawayo were aware that Sign language is the language for deaf children but perceived it as difficult to learn/teach and as a set of gestures which could only be used for expressing simple concrete ideas. The teachers were also not fully aware of the official status of Sign language. From the findings, it was also clear that the teachers did not appreciate the native and natural status of Sign language and were not sure whether it has its own proper grammatical structure which is adequate to express abstract ideas. A Chi-Square analysis confirmed these results but showed that despite findings to the contrary, specialist teachers perceived Sign language more positively than mainstream teachers. The main conclusion from these results was that deaf children in schools in Bulawayo were not exposed to the full linguistic structure of Sign language and were consequently denied development of their Deaf culture. This compromised their education. On these bases, the study recommended staff development of teachers, establishment of Sign language resource centers, and harmonization of policies with the new Constitution and a similar but in-depth study of a national magnitude.The study set out to establish and analyse how teachers in schools that enroll deaf children in Bulawayo (Zimbabwe) perceived Sign language. A sample of ۳۰ specialist and ۳۰ mainstream teachers participated in the study which utilized descriptive and comparative survey designs. A Self-Designed Sign Language Perception Thematic Scale was used for data collection. The data were summarized into tables and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results indicated that teachers in schools that enroll deaf children in Bulawayo were aware that Sign language is the language for deaf children but perceived it as difficult to learn/teach and as a set of gestures which could only be used for expressing simple concrete ideas. The teachers were also not fully aware of the official status of Sign language. From the findings, it was also clear that the teachers did not appreciate the native and natural status of Sign language and were not sure whether it has its own proper grammatical structure which is adequate to express abstract ideas. A Chi-Square analysis confirmed these results but showed that despite findings to the contrary, specialist teachers perceived Sign language more positively than mainstream teachers. The main conclusion from these results was that deaf children in schools in Bulawayo were not exposed to the full linguistic structure of Sign language and were consequently denied development of their Deaf culture. This compromised their education. On these bases, the study recommended staff development of teachers, establishment of Sign language resource centers, and harmonization of policies with the new Constitution and a similar but in-depth study of a national magnitude.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Patrick Sibanda

Senior Lecturer in the Department of Disability Studies and Special Needs Education; Zimbabwe Open University

Sylod Chimhenga

Senior Student Advisor; Zimbabwe Open University

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Adoyo, P.O., 2002. Emergent approaches towards sign bilingualism in deaf ...
  • Bahan, B., 1989. Notes from a seeing person. In Wilcox, ...
  • Baker, R., Knight, P., 1998. Total communication: Current policy and ...
  • Barker, C., 1992. Attitudes and Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. ...
  • Bat-Chava, Y., 1993. Antecedents of self-esteem in deaf people: A ...
  • Batterbury, S.C.E., 2012. Language justice for sign language peoples: The ...
  • Baum, H.D.L., Murray, J.J., 2009. Reframing: From hearing loss to ...
  • Bauman, H.D.L., Murray, J.J., 2014. Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes ...
  • Branson, J., Miller, D., 2002. Damned for their difference: the ...
  • Brelje, H.W., 1999. Global perspectives on the education of the ...
  • Burns, S., Matthews, P., Nolan-Conroy, E., 2001. Language Attitudes. In ...
  • Conrad, R., 1979. The deaf school child: language and cognitive ...
  • Edwards, R.A.R., 2010. Hearing aids are not deaf: A historical ...
  • Evans, C.J., 1998. Literacy acquisition in deaf children. Paper presented ...
  • Farber, G.B.S., 2015. Social perception toward deafness: How could it ...
  • Garret, P., 2010. Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Glaser, M., Van Pletzen, E., 2012. Inclusive education for deaf ...
  • Government of Zimbabwe, 1992. Disabled Persons Act. Harare : Government ...
  • Government of Zimbabwe, 2013. Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No 20: ...
  • James, T., O’Neill, E., Smyth, J., 1990. Reading Assessment of ...
  • Jokinen, M., 2005. Linguistic rights: sign language as a right ...
  • Kiyaya, N.B., Moores, D.F., 2009. Deafness in Sub-Saharan Africa. In ...
  • Krausneker, V., 2015. Ideologies and attitudes toward sign languages: An ...
  • Kyle, J., Allsop, L., 1997. Sign on Europe: A Study ...
  • Ladd, P., 2003. Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. ...
  • Lane, H., 1992. The mask of benevolence: Disabling the deaf ...
  • Lane, H., 2008. Do deaf people have a disability? In ...
  • Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., Bahan, B., 1996. A journey into ...
  • Leeson, l., 2006. Signed languages in education in Europe: A ...
  • Leigh, I., 2009. A Lens on Deaf Identities: Perspectives on ...
  • May, S., 2003. Misconceiving minority language rights: Implications for liberal ...
  • Musengi, M., Chireshe, R., 2012. Inclusion of deaf students in ...
  • Mutswanga, P., Mapuranga, B., 2014. Perceptions of ‘Hearing’ people on ...
  • Nations, 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. New ...
  • Nonna, N., Kato, M., 2003. Establishing sign Language in Deaf ...
  • Padden, C., Humphries, T., 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from ...
  • Preston, D.R., 2002. Language with an Attitude. In Chambers, J.K., ...
  • Rittenhouse, R.K., 1987. The attitudes of teachers toward mainstreaming of ...
  • Skutnuabb-Kangas, T., 2003. Linguistic genocide and the deaf. Paper presented ...
  • Stokoe, W., 1960. Sign Language Structure. New York: University of ...
  • Trovato, S., 2013. A stronger reason for the right to ...
  • United Nations, 1989. Convention on the rights of the child. ...
  • United Nations, 1994. The salamanca statement and framework for action ...
  • United Nations, 2007. Convention on the rights of people with ...
  • Vygotsky, L.S., 1983. The fundamentals of defectology. In Rieber, R.W., ...
  • Wrigley, O., 1996. The politics of deafness. Washington DC: Gallaudet ...
  • Zaitseva, G., Pursglove, M., Gregory, S., 1999. Vygotsky, sign language ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع