Exposition of the grammatical structure of sign language

سال انتشار: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 38

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJPAS-6-9_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 اسفند 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Many people hardly believe that sign language is a fully fledged language. Some people mistakenly think that sign language is oral language conveyed through signs while some think that it is a manual code of English for instance. They think that it is a type of pantomime (exaggerated set of signs) rather than a real language. There are also misconceptions among the public that sign language can only be used to express concrete information and that it is universal. Signs in a sign language have been regarded simply as unanalysable iconic gestures with little or no internal organisation at all. To the contrary, linguistic research has however demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that sign languages of the world are fully fledged languages with their own formal grammatical structures and well established lexicons. William Stokoe (۱۹۶۰) was the first researcher to demonstrate that signs of a sign language have an internal sub lexical structure analogous to that found in words of spoken languages. Thus, sign language is comparable to spoken language both in terms of complexity and expressiveness. It is not a manual rendition of oral language, but an independent formal language in its own right. In addition, sign language is not universal, but just like in the case of oral/spoken languages which are spoken by different people in different countries, deaf people around the world sign different sign languages. The sign language grammatical structure subscribes to the same linguistic rules enjoyed by oral language.Many people hardly believe that sign language is a fully fledged language. Some people mistakenly think that sign language is oral language conveyed through signs while some think that it is a manual code of English for instance. They think that it is a type of pantomime (exaggerated set of signs) rather than a real language. There are also misconceptions among the public that sign language can only be used to express concrete information and that it is universal. Signs in a sign language have been regarded simply as unanalysable iconic gestures with little or no internal organisation at all. To the contrary, linguistic research has however demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that sign languages of the world are fully fledged languages with their own formal grammatical structures and well established lexicons. William Stokoe (۱۹۶۰) was the first researcher to demonstrate that signs of a sign language have an internal sub lexical structure analogous to that found in words of spoken languages. Thus, sign language is comparable to spoken language both in terms of complexity and expressiveness. It is not a manual rendition of oral language, but an independent formal language in its own right. In addition, sign language is not universal, but just like in the case of oral/spoken languages which are spoken by different people in different countries, deaf people around the world sign different sign languages. The sign language grammatical structure subscribes to the same linguistic rules enjoyed by oral language.

نویسندگان

Patrick Sibanda

Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Acton, Q.A., 2012. Advances in manual communication research and application. ...
  • Anderson, E.R., 1998. A Grammar of Iconism. New York: Fairleigh ...
  • Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., Sandler, W., 2004. Morphological ...
  • Berent, I., Dupuis, A., Brentari, D., 2014. Phonological reduplication in ...
  • Binet, A., Simon, T., 1997. An investigation concerning the value ...
  • Branson, J., Miller, D., Marsaja, I.G., 1999. Sign language as ...
  • Chimedza, R., Sithole, C.Z., Rinashe, H.M., 1998. Zimbabwe national sign ...
  • Crystal, D., Graig, E., 1978. Contrived sign language. In Schlesinger, ...
  • De Vos, C., 2012. Sign- spatiality in Kata Kolok: How ...
  • Dirksen, B., 2008. Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking. Minnesota: ...
  • Ferandez, E.M., Cairns, H.S., 2011. Fundamentals of Psycholinguistics. West Sussex: ...
  • Freeman, RD., Carbin, C.F., Boese, R.J., 1981. Can’t your child ...
  • Geert, B., 2005. The grammar of words: An introduction to ...
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., 2003. The resilience of language: What gesture creation ...
  • Hauser, M.D., Fitch, W.T., 2003. What are the uniquely human ...
  • Hoemann, H.W., 1983. Communicating with deaf people. Baltimore: University Park ...
  • King, R.G., 1979. Fundamentals of human communication. New York: Macmillan ...
  • Klima, E.S., Bellugi, U., 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge: ...
  • Maier, E., de Schepper, K., Zwets, M., 2013. The pragmatics ...
  • Mayberry, R.I., 2007. When timing is everything: Age of first ...
  • McAnnally, P.L., Rose, S., Quigley, S.P., 1994. Language learning practices ...
  • Meadow, K., 1977. Name signs and identity symbols in the ...
  • Neidle, C., Lee, R.G., 2005. The syntactic organisation of American ...
  • Newell, W., Holcomb, S., Holcomb, B.R., Pocobello, D., Boardman, K., ...
  • Newport, E.L., Supalla, T., 2000. Sign language research at the ...
  • Nonaka, A.M., 2004. The forgotten endangered languages: Lessons on the ...
  • Novogrodsky, R., Fish, S., Hoffmeister, R., 2015. Semantic and phonological ...
  • Sandler, W., Lillo-Martin, D., 2001. Natural sign languages. In Aronoff, ...
  • Schmalz, K., Walter, G., 1980. Introduction to communication. New York: ...
  • Stokoe, W., Casterline, D., Croneberg, C., 1976. A dictionary of ...
  • Stokoe, W.C(Jnr), 2005. Sign language structure: An outline of the ...
  • Zucchi, S., 2012. Formal semantics of sign languages. Language and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع