Review and comparison of different risk assessment methods used for intelligent pigging operations in oil and gas pipelines with emphasis on the Bow Tie method

سال انتشار: 1403
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 134

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJRRS-7-1_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 بهمن 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Considering the importance and role of process industries, including the oil and gas industry, in each country's economy and on the other hand, as the dangers and risks in these industries are high, it is very important to identify, control and analyze them in process industries. This study aims to investigate and compare different risk assessment methods used for intelligent pigging operations in oil and gas pipelines, emphasising the Bow Tie method. Various risk assessment methods were also examined in this study. Finally, it was observed that the Bow Tie method is an efficient method for assessing the risk of intelligent pigging ‎operation in oil and gas pipelines, which has more advantages than other risk assessment methods, and by combining fault tree analysis (FTA) and event tree analysis (ETA), a comprehensive risk assessment of intelligent pigging ‎operation ‎in oil and gas pipelines can be reached.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

Mohammad Mehdi Salemi

Department of Environment and HSE, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad university, Ahvaz, Iran

Leila Ebrahimy Ghavam Abadi

Department of Environment and HSE, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad university, Ahvaz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Nabipour, M. Malairi, “Pig and Pig Run in Pipelines: Challenges ...
  • Kabiri, H. Khosravi, and H. Rashidi, H. Shiri, “Risk assessment ...
  • Hamzavi, D. Mola, and H. Momeni, “New technologies of intelligent ...
  • Tekyeh, M. Jafari, B. Mortazavi, “Application of Bow-Tie technique in ...
  • Velayatzadeh, S. Twelve Imams, and m. Velayatzadeh, “Modeling the analysis ...
  • Sahafi, M. Nasrabadi, and S. Giveh Chi, “The necessity and ...
  • Sadouni, “Risk assessment of the gas pressure reduction station using ...
  • Asemani, “Modeling of pigging operations in oil and gas pipelines,” ...
  • Mirzaei Aliabadi, R. Ismaili, A. Mohammad Pham, and M. Ashrafi, ...
  • Vafaei, “Analysis of risk and reliability of human performance in ...
  • Velayatzadeh, S. Twelve Imams, h. Ahmadi, and Omidred, “Pigging Station ...
  • Hongyu, L. Shiao, and J. Hong, “Risk analysis and countermeasures ...
  • Sameti, “The role of Bow-tie Method in improving and optimizing ...
  • Qaroun, A. Jozi, “Environmental Risk Management of Bandar Abbas-Sirjan Oil ...
  • Heyrani, A. Baghaei, “Risk assessment of oil and gas transmission ...
  • Kazemi, A. Abbasi, M. Kazemi, N. Jamshidzadeh, and M. Rashidi, ...
  • Mirzaei Aliabadi, A. Mohammad Pham, A. Ahmadigarh, and R. Esmaili, ...
  • S. Markowski, A. Kotynia, “Bow-tie model in Layer of Protection ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع