In vitro Evaluation of the Relationship between Gray Scales in Digital Intraoral Radiographs and Hounsfield Units in CT Scans

سال انتشار: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 115

فایل این مقاله در 10 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JBPE-7-3_010

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 دی 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Jaw bone quality plays an essential role in treatment planning and prognosis of dental implants. Regarding several available methods for bone density measurements, they are not routinely used before implant surgery due to hard accessibility.Objective: An in vitro investigation of correlation between average gray scale in direct digital radiographs and Hounsfield units in CT-Scan provides a feasible method for evaluating alveolar bone quality prior to implant surgery.Methods: ۲۶ sheep’s mandibles in which a square shape ROI marked by gutta percha, were prepared. Three direct digital radiographs (CCD sensor) from every specimen were taken using ۸۰, ۱۰۰ and ۲۰۰ milli-seconds. Then, the average gray levels for ROIs were calculated using a costume-made software. Next, the specimens were scanned using a ۱۶-slice spiral CT and the Hounsfield Unit of each ROI was calculated. Pearson analysis measured the correlation between Hounsfield units and average gray levels.Results: There was a positive correlation between Hounsfield unit and average gray level in the radiographs and the correlation was better in higher exposure times. Conclusion: It is possible to estimate Hounsfield unit and bone density in the jaw bones using average gray scale in a digital radiograph. This approach is easy, simple and available and also results in lower patient exposure comparing other bone densitometric analysis methods.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

L Khojastepour

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (M.Sc.), Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

S Mohammadzadeh

Specialist in Periodontology (M.Sc.), Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran

M Jazayeri

Specialist in Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (M.Sc.), Private Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Khoramabad, Iran

M Omidi

Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (M.Sc), Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, International Branch, Shiraz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Compston J. Bone quality: what is it and how is ...
  • Fyhrie DP. SummaryMeasuring “bone quality”. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. ۲۰۰۵;۵:۳۱۸-۲۰. ...
  • Licata A. Bone density vs bone quality: what’s a clinician ...
  • Sievanen H, Kannus P, Jarvinen TL. Bone quality: an empty ...
  • Minkin C, Marinho VC. Role of the osteoclast at the ...
  • Sakka S, Coulthard P. Bone quality: a reality for the ...
  • Santiago RC, de Paula FO, Fraga MR, Picorelli Assis NM, ...
  • Misch CE. Bone density: a key determinant for treatment planning. ...
  • Johansson P, Strid K. Assessment of bone quality from cutting ...
  • Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam ...
  • Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels ...
  • Naitoh M, Aimiya H, Hirukawa A, Ariji E. Morphometric analysis ...
  • Merheb J, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Jacobs R, Naert ...
  • Gomes PP, Guimaraes Filho R, Mazzonetto R. Evaluation of the ...
  • Trisi P, Todisco M, Consolo U, Travaglini D. High versus ...
  • Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS, Saricaoglu ST, Can G. An in ...
  • Ulusu T, Bodur H, Odabas ME. In vitro comparison of ...
  • Kamburoglu K, Senel B, Yuksel SP, Ozen T. A comparison ...
  • Senel B, Kamburoglu K, Ucok O, Yuksel SP, Ozen T, ...
  • Schropp L, Alyass NS, Wenzel A, Stavropoulos A. Validity of ...
  • Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant ...
  • Morea C, Dominguez GC, Coutinho A, Chilvarquer I. Quantitative analysis ...
  • Gu L, Yu LY, Zhou Y, Xie C. Application of ...
  • Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of ...
  • Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. ...
  • Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using ...
  • Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T. Reliability of ...
  • Miles DA, Danforth RA. A clinician’s guide to understanding cone ...
  • Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Horner K, Zhao F, Lindh C, ...
  • Sakakura CE, Giro G, Goncalves D, Pereira RM, Orrico SR, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع