Assessment of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Dental School Faculty Members towards two Student Assessment Tools
سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 133
فایل این مقاله در 7 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_SDME-19-1_011
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 آذر 1402
چکیده مقاله:
Background: Assessment plays a great role in encouraging learning and evaluating whether the learning objectives have been achieved.Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of dental faculty members toward Patient Management Problem (PMP) and Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ) tests.Methods: In this descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was used to collect information from ۵۴ faculty members of the dental school of Kerman University of Medical Sciences from ۲۰۱۹ to ۲۰۲۰. This study’s questionnaire consisted of two parts: the first part included demographic information, and the second included questions related to the faculty members' knowledge (۱۰ questions) and attitudes (۸ questions) towards MCQ and PMP tests. Cronbach’s alpha was considered to be ۰.۸. Content validity was assessed to determine the validity of the questionnaire. SPSS ۲۰ was used to analyze the data, which included descriptive statistics such as percentage, mean, and standard deviation, as well as non-parametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis and linear regression tests.Results: Fifty four dentistry faculty members returned the completed questionnaires in this study. Amongst them, ۳۴(۶۳%) were female, and ۲۰(۳۷%) were male. The mean scores of the knowledge and attitudes questionnaire toward the MCQ and PMP tests were ۷.۲۰ and ۲۷.۸۳, respectively. The Mean scores of the knowledge and attitudes had no significant relationship with age, gender, and teaching experience.Conclusion: Based on the results, it can be concluded that the dental faculty members had good knowledge about MCQs and PMPs structures and their strengths and weaknesses. There was also a good awareness of the shortcomings of the MCQ test in the assessment of clinical reasoning and the lack of transparency of this assessment tool.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Fatemeh Sadat Sajadi
Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Marzieh Pirzadeh-Ashraf
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Ali Eskandarizadeh
Endodontology Research Center, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Mohammad Izadi
Dentist, Private Practice, Kerman, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :