Academic Ethics: Moral Luck of University Students in Iran

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 48

فایل این مقاله در 5 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJETH-1-1_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 15 آذر 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Over the past several years, a lot of talks have been produced and published in Iran about the controversial and disputed position of academic ethics. Some evidence shows normative weaknesses or even anomalies in the universities. This means worrying signs of an anomic situation, at least in the range of academics and students. In this discussion, I will concentrate on those parts of the claims and speeches that declare about the shaking position in the academic ethics of students, such as the prevalence of academic credentials, a rare passion for learning, trifling courses, plagiarism and academic fraud, black market dealing thesis (Enghelab avenue phenomenon), the so-called "copy and paste" behaviors in the preparation of articles, negligence in academic norms and academic assignments, fake numbers and forging articles, lack of sense of responsibility, self-centered individualism, and low motivation for group work, the lack of serious acceptance from learning communities and so on. Conclusion: We are less concerned about what the "conditions of possibility" are for the ethics of student in this country. Some important conceptual and critical researches have been taken into account in ethical research topics on world collaboration for human morality. The question of the current study is as follows: how much is the cooperation of the current Iranian society, higher education system, and management of university and class with our students for the ethics of their studying and their proper socialization. In this study, moral luck theory is used, which is a part of the major issues of modern science and moral philosophy. Nelkin, Nagel and Williams have discussed it. At the end, reflection on "student as victim" is also viewed from the perspective of ethics.

نویسندگان

Maghsoud Farasatkhah

Dept. of Planning in Higher Education, Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Vedadhir AA, Farhud DD, Ghazi Tabatabaei M, Tavasoli G (۲۰۰۸). ...
  • Marjaei SH (۲۰۱۶). Ethics on science and its challenges at ...
  • Ebrahimi G (۱۹۹۳). The scientific community and its norms. Journal ...
  • Nagel T, Williams B (۱۹۷۶). Moral Luck. Proceedings of the ...
  • Nelkin, DK (۲۰۱۳). Moral Luck. Available at: Https://plato.stanford. Edu/entries/moral luck. ...
  • Sandelowski M, Barroso J (۲۰۰۷). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. ...
  • Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M ...
  • Khazaei Z, Tamadon F (۲۰۱۶). Bernard William’s viewpoint on moral ...
  • Ebadati J, Atrak H (۲۰۱۷). A critic of Bernard Williams’ ...
  • Zagzebski L (۲۰۱۷). Virtues of the mind: an inquiry into ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع