Management of Sport-Related Fractures: Operative Versus Non-Operative Management

سال انتشار: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 113

فایل این مقاله در 9 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TRAUM-23-4_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 آبان 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Background: Fractures are the most serious injury suffered by athletes, resulting in the greatest time recuperating from Such injuries. Objectives: To describe the difference in outcome for non-operative versus operative management of site-specific soccer-related fractures. Methods: All fractures sustained during soccer from ۲۰۰۷ to ۲۰۰۸ within the Lothian population were prospectively recorded. Patients were followed up in August ۲۰۱۰, via telephone, to determine return rates and times to soccer. High incidence fractures with significant rates of surgery (Tibial Diaphysis, Ankle, Scaphoid, Clavicle, Metacarpus Distal Radius) were identified and classified according to the AO system. Outcomes of similar fracture classifications with contrasting management were compared. Results: Of ۳۶۷ fractures identified during the study period, ۲۰% were managed operatively. The rates of surgery for the six fractures cohorts were Tibial Diaphyseal ۶۷%, Ankle ۵۱%, Scaphoid ۲۵%, Clavicle ۲۰%, Metacarpal ۱۱% and Distal Radial ۱۰%. Operatively managed fractures of the Distal Radius (۱۴ weeks vs. ۹ weeks: P < ۰.۰۳۱), Ankle (۴۲ weeks vs. ۲۲ weeks: P < ۰.۰۰۴) and Metacarpus (۱۸ weeks vs. ۵ weeks: P < ۰.۰۰۱) took longer to return to soccer than non-operatively managed fractures, while operatively managed fractures of the Tibial Diaphysis took shorter to return (۳۵ weeks vs. ۴۵ weeks: P = ۰.۶۷۳). Operatively managed fractures of the Ankle (۵۷% vs. ۲۲%: P < ۰.۰۲۹), Tibial Diaphysis (۸۹% vs. ۵۰%: P = ۰.۶۸۳), Scaphoid (۸۰% vs. ۶۰%: P = ۰.۶۱۳), Clavicle (۵۰% vs. ۳۱%: P = ۰.۵۸۴), Distal Radius (۵۰% vs. ۱۸%: P = ۰.۲۳۴) and Metacarpus (۶۷% vs. ۴۰%: P = ۰.۵۳۷) had higher rates of persisting symptoms at follow-up than non-operatively managed fractures. Conclusions: The role of operative management in the treatment of soccer-related fractures is specific to the location and nature of the fracture. The effect of operative management on return times to sport is fracture specific, though invariably this is associated with higher rates of persisting symptoms. The decision regarding the choice of non-operative versus operative management requires clinical judgment on an individual basis, based on the fracture location and configuration.

کلیدواژه ها: