Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates
محل انتشار: مجله تروما، دوره: 18، شماره: 1
سال انتشار: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 84
متن کامل این مقاله منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل مقاله (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_TRAUM-18-1_005
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 آبان 1402
چکیده مقاله:
Background: Monocortical miniplate fixation is an accepted and reliable method for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Although placement of a second miniplate may theoretically provide more stability; however, the clinical importance of this issue remains controversial. Objectives: The present study assessed the postoperative complications and outcomes associated with the fixation of mandibular angle fractures using ۱ and ۲ miniplates in patients with favorable mandibular angle fractures. Patients and Methods: A prospective study of ۸۷ patients (۷۳ males, ۱۴ females) with favorable mandibular angle fractures was done. In the first group, a ۴-hole miniplate was placed at the superior border through an intraoral approach. In group ۲, patients were treated with ۲ miniplates, one placed at the superior border (similar to group ۱) and the other on the lateral aspect of the angle at the inferior border through an intraoral and transcutaneous approach using a trocar. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, malunion and sensory disturbances associated with surgery, additional maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) by means of an arch bar and wires for a longer period (for delayed union) and infection were assessed in patients of both groups up to ۱۲ months postoperatively. The data were analyzed using the chi-square test. Results: In the single miniplate group, ۲۵ patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (۵۵.۶%), ۲۲ patients required additional use of MMF (۴۸.۹%) and ۳ patients developed infections (۶.۷%). In the double miniplate group ۲۰ patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (۴۷.۶%), ۱۸ patients required additional use of MMF (۴۲.۹%) and ۱ patient developed infection (۲.۴%). None of the patients in either group showed malocclusion or malunion. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding overall complication rate. Conclusions: In this study, use of one miniplate or two miniplates for treatment of favorable mandibular angle fractures was associated with a similar incidence of complications. Thus, it seems that the use of two miniplates in this setting may not be warranted, nor cost-efficient.
کلیدواژه ها: