Relationship between Impulsivity and Meta-Cognition with Cognitive Failures
محل انتشار: مجله بین المللی علوم رفتاری، دوره: 15، شماره: 1
سال انتشار: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 111
فایل این مقاله در 5 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_BEHAVS-15-1_010
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 مرداد 1402
چکیده مقاله:
Abstract Introduction: Inadvertent mistakes are often major problems in daily life. Cognitive failure is the nomenclature attributed to these defects and cognitive failures questionnaire measures the self-reported frequency of these mistakes. It is hypothesized that impulsivity and meta-cognition have underlying associations with cognitive failures. The present study aimed to explore the relationship between impulsivity and meta-cognition with cognitive failures. Method: A randomly selected sample of ۱۲۵ university students (age range: ۱۸-۲۲) administered the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale Questionnaire, and Meta-Cognition Questionnaire (MCQ). Data were analyzed using regression. Results: The results indicated that the component of meta-cognition, cognitive confidence had a positive significant relationship with cognitive failures (r=۰.۵۱, p<۰.۰۱). Furthermore, amongst components of impulsivity, urgency had a significant negative relationship with cognitive failures (r=-۰.۴۴, p<۰.۰۱). A regression analysis revealed that cognitive confidence and urgency could predict cognitive failure variance. According to Beta coefficients, relative potion of cognitive confidence to predict CF was ۵۱% at first step and ۴۰% in the second. Relative potion of urgency in the second step was ۲۷%. Conclusion: The effect of little urgency and inefficient cognitive confidence is noticeable in distraction, memory problems, blunders and lack of names remembering.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Sedighe Mirzaee
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Mahnaz Shahgholian
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad-Hossein Abdollahi
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Samira Akhavan-Arjmand
Department of Psychology, Shiraz Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :