Comparison of different DNA extraction methods for the molecular study of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae)

سال انتشار: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 87

فایل این مقاله در 12 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JIBS-6-1_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 خرداد 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Bark beetles are one of the most important pests in forests. Because of their small size and highly similar morphological characters, molecular approaches may be quite useful for a valid species determination. In this context molecular identification represents an accurate and modern method for species identification. The purity and high quantity of extracted DNA have important role in successful amplification of the target fragment of the genome. The aim of this study was comparing different DNA extraction methods in order to choose the highest quality and quantity of DNA extract for the identification of bark beetles. During the study bark beetles were collected from different parts of the North forests of Iran. Five different DNA extraction methods were performed and evaluated on individual specimen including Chelex, Phenol chloroform, CTAB, salting out and Lysis buffer in the laboratory. The quantity and quality of extracted DNA were measured by spectrophotometer and gel electrophoresis. The result of DNA quantity mean ranged between (۲۳.۶-۵۷۹.۷ ng/µl) and the mean quality which was measured by ۲۶۰/۲۸۰ ratio (۰.۹-۱.۸). The statistical analysis was done by SPSS software, revealing significant differences between extraction methods. The results suggested that Chelex and salting out showed the highest quantity of all used methods.

کلیدواژه ها:

نویسندگان

sudabe Amini

Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Jamasb Nozari

Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Reza Hosseini

Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Rassol Rahati

Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Amini, S. & Hosseini, R. (۲۰۱۶) A multiplex polymerase chain ...
  • Furniss, R. L. & Carolin, V.M. (۱۹۷۷) Western forest insects. ...
  • Hebert, P.D., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L. & Dewaard, J.R. (۲۰۰۳) ...
  • Hoy, M.A. (۲۰۰۳) Insect molecular genetics. an Introduction to principles ...
  • Hulcr, J., Atkinson, T. H., Cognato, A. I., Jordal, B. ...
  • Lawrence, J.F. & Newton, A.F. (۱۹۹۵) Families and subfamilies of ...
  • Longmire JL, Maltbie M. & Baker R.J. (۱۹۹۷) Use of ...
  • Nancy, C. C., Mauricio, Q., Horacio, C. C. & Guadalupe, ...
  • Petrigh, R.S. & Fugassa, M.H. (۲۰۱۴) Molecular identification of Nematodirus ...
  • Psifidi, A., Dovas, C.I. & Banos, G. (۲۰۱۰) A comparison ...
  • Rampelotti, F.T., Ferreira, A., Tcacenco, F.A. & Martins, J.F.S. (۲۰۰۸) ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۵۹۰/S۱۵۱۹-۵۶۶X۲۰۰۸۰۰۰۱۰۰۰۰۴Rohland, N., Malaspinas, A.S., Pollack, J.L., Slatkin, M. & Matheus, ...
  • Santini, A. & Faccoli, M. (۲۰۱۵) Dutch elm disease and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع