Predicting the Young's Modulus and Uniaxial Compressive Strength of a typical limestone using the Principal Component Regression and Particle Swarm Optimization

سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 281

فایل این مقاله در 28 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JEG-16-1_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 خرداد 1402

چکیده مقاله:

In geotechnical engineering, rock mechanics and engineering geology, depending on the project design, uniaxial strength and static Youngchr('۳۹')s modulus of rocks are of vital importance. The direct determination of the aforementioned parameters in the laboratory, however, requires intact and high-quality cores and preparation of their specimens have some limitations. Moreover, performing these tests is time-consuming and costly. Therefore, in this study, it was tried to precisely predict the desirable parameters using physical characteristics and ultrasonic tests. To do so, two methods, i.e. principal components regression and support vector regression, were employed. The parameters used in modelling included density, P- wave velocity, dynamic Poisson’s ratio and porosity. Accordingly, the experimental results conducted on ۱۱۵ limestone rock samples, including uniaxial compressive and ultrasonic tests, were used and the desired parameters in the modelling were extracted using the laboratory results. By means of correlation coefficient (R۲), normalized mean square error (NMSE) and Mean absolute error (MAE), the developed models were validated and their accuracy were evaluated. The obtained results showed that both methods could estimate the target parameters with high accuracy. In support vector regression, Particle Swarm Optimization method was used for determining optimal values of box constraint mode and epsilon mode, and the modelling was conducted using four kernel functions, including linear, quadratic, cubic and Gaussian. Here, the quadratic kernel function yielded the best result for UCS and cubic kernel function yielded the best result for Es. In addition, comparing the results of the principal components regression and the support vector regression indicated that the latter outperformed the former.

نویسندگان

مریم مختاری

Department of Civil engineering, Faculty of engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Aboutaleb S., Behnia M., Bagherpour R., Bluekian B., “Using non-destructive ...
  • Kramer R. “Chemometric Techniques for Quantitative Analysis.” New York, ( ...
  • Liu R. X. Kuang J., Gong Q., Hou X. L., ...
  • Abedi M., Norouzi G. H., Bahroudi A., “Support vector machine ...
  • Smola A. J., Schölkopf B., “A tutoria on support vector ...
  • Starzec P. “Dynamic elastic properties of crystalline rocks from south-west ...
  • Looney C. G. “Advances in feed forward neural networks: demystifying ...
  • Novitasari D., Cholissodin I., Mahmudy W. F., “Optimizing SVR using ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع