Transitivity Processes in Quantitative Versus Qualitative Applied Linguistics Research Articles' Discussions
سال انتشار: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 347
فایل این مقاله در 20 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد
- صدور گواهی نمایه سازی
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_RELT-11-1_002
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 فروردین 1402
چکیده مقاله:
Transitivity and its associated clausal semantic processes are assumed to bear textual representations of reality and encode authors' conceptions of the world in linguistic terms. Given this and the differential epistemologies featuring quantitative and qualitative research, the transitivity analysis of their associated academic reports gains salience. This study involved the comparative transitivity analysis of the discussion sections of ۴۰ quantitative and qualitative applied linguistics research articles. Relative distributions of the six transitivity processes in systemic functional linguistics (relational, material, verbal, mental, existential, and behavioral) were investigated through a series of Chi-Square tests. Moreover, the most frequent processes in quantitative and qualitative discussions were in terms of their semantic associations. The results showed that mental, relational, and behavioral processes were the most frequent in both quantitative and qualitative discussions. In addition, qualitative research articles' discussions housed more mental and material processes, while quantitative research articles' discussions involved a significantly higher number of relational, verbal, and behavioral processes. However, frequent processes were semantically similar in the two corpora. The results are discussed regarding the ideological and generic associations of quantitative and qualitative research. The findings have implications for academic writing instruction and shed light on linguistically encoded reality in quantitative and qualitative research articles.
کلیدواژه ها:
نویسندگان
Marzieh Bagherkazemi
Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch), Tehran, Iran
Zahra Dehini
Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch), Tehran, Iran
Maryam Jalali Moghaddam
Department of English Language Teaching, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Bita Ghalandar-Zehi
Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch), Tehran, Iran
مراجع و منابع این مقاله:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :